Core i9-14901E
EPYC 7282
Core i9-14901E vs EPYC 7282 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-14901E vs EPYC 7282 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-14901E vs EPYC 7282: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-14901E
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +17.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $93 less on MSRP ($557 MSRP vs $650 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 17.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 54.4 vs 46.5 PassMark/$ ($557 MSRP vs $650 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of SP3 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (36 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7282, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
EPYC 7282
2019Why buy it
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 36 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 20.
- ✅540% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-14901E across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (7,638 vs 14,262).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 46.5 vs 54.4 PassMark/$ ($650 MSRP vs $557 MSRP).
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on SP3 with DDR4, while Core i9-14901E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-14901E better than EPYC 7282?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-14901E vs EPYC 7282 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Core i9-14901E
The Core i9-14901E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,298 points. Launch price was $499.
EPYC 7282
The EPYC 7282 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,201 points. Launch price was $650.
Processing Power
The Core i9-14901E packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the EPYC 7282 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7282 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14901E versus 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7282 — a 54.5% clock advantage for the Core i9-14901E (base: 2.8 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i9-14901E uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the EPYC 7282 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14901E scores 30,298 against the EPYC 7282's 30,201 — a 0.3% lead for the Core i9-14901E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,894 vs 1,086, a 90.9% lead for the Core i9-14901E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,262 vs 7,638 (60.5% advantage for the Core i9-14901E). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14901E vs 64 MB on the EPYC 7282.
| Feature | Core i9-14901E | EPYC 7282 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 5.6 GHz+75% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.8 GHz | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 36 MB (total) | 64 MB+78% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB (per core) | 8 MB+300% |
| Process | 10 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm-30% |
| Architecture | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 30,298 | 30,201 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 13,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 2,894+166% | 1,086 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 14,262+87% | 7,638 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-14901E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the EPYC 7282 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14901E versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7282 — the Core i9-14901E supports 75% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7282 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 2033.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-14901E) vs 8 (EPYC 7282). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14901E) vs 128 (EPYC 7282) — the EPYC 7282 offers 108 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 Series,Intel 700 Series (Core i9-14901E) and SP3,Rome (EPYC 7282).
| Feature | Core i9-14901E | EPYC 7282 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA1700 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 5.0+25% | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR5-5600+75% | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 192 GB | 4096 GB+2033% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 20 | 128+540% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization support: Yes (Core i9-14901E) vs AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7282). The Core i9-14901E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the EPYC 7282 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: EPYC 7282 targets Edge Server / Entry Server. Direct competitor: EPYC 7282 rivals Xeon Silver 4216.
| Feature | Core i9-14901E | EPYC 7282 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Intel UHD Graphics 770 | — |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | No | No |
| Virtualization | Yes | AMD-V, SEV |
| Target Use | — | Edge Server / Entry Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-14901E was priced at $557, while the EPYC 7282 came in at $650. On launch pricing ($557 vs $650), Core i9-14901E was $93 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-14901E delivers 54.4 pts/$ vs 46.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 7282 — making the Core i9-14901E the 15.7% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-14901E | EPYC 7282 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $557-14% | $650 |
| Performance per Dollar | 54.4+17% | 46.5 |
| Release Date | 2024 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Core i9-14901E and EPYC 7282
