
Core i9-9990XE

Core i9-14901E
Core i9-9990XE vs Core i9-14901E Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-9990XE vs Core i9-14901E FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-9990XE vs Core i9-14901E: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-9990XE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅120% more PCIe lanes (44 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 36 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.1 vs 54.4 PassMark/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $557 MSRP).
- ❌292.3% higher power demand at 255W vs 65W.
- ❌Older platform position on LGA2066 with DDR4, while Core i9-14901E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-14901E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Core i9-14901E
2024Why buy it
- ✅+87% larger total L3 cache (36 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Costs $1,443 less on MSRP ($557 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 260.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 54.4 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($557 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 255W, a 190W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA2066 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9990XE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (14,262 vs 16,199).
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-9990XE better than Core i9-14901E?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-9990XE vs Core i9-14901E Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-9990XE
The Core i9-9990XE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 255 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,162 points. Launch price was $2,800.

Core i9-14901E
The Core i9-14901E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,298 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Core i9-9990XE packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the Core i9-14901E offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Core i9-9990XE has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-9990XE versus 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14901E — a 9.3% clock advantage for the Core i9-14901E (base: 4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i9-9990XE uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the Core i9-14901E uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9990XE scores 30,162 against the Core i9-14901E's 30,298 — a 0.4% lead for the Core i9-14901E. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,392 vs 2,894, a 70.1% lead for the Core i9-14901E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,199 vs 14,262 (12.7% advantage for the Core i9-9990XE). L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-9990XE vs 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14901E.
| Feature | Core i9-9990XE | Core i9-14901E |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 28+75% | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz | 5.6 GHz+10% |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+43% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total) | 36 MB (total)+87% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 14 nm | 10 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 30,162 | 30,298 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,392 | 2,894+108% |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,199+14% | 14,262 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9990XE uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Core i9-14901E uses LGA1700 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i9-9990XE versus DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14901E — the Core i9-14901E supports 110.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Core i9-14901E supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 50% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i9-9990XE) vs 2 (Core i9-14901E). PCIe lanes: 44 (Core i9-9990XE) vs 20 (Core i9-14901E) — the Core i9-9990XE offers 24 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-9990XE) and Intel 600 Series,Intel 700 Series (Core i9-14901E).
| Feature | Core i9-9990XE | Core i9-14901E |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR5-5600+110% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 4+100% | 2 |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 44+120% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-9990XE supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-9990XE) vs Yes (Core i9-14901E). The Core i9-14901E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Core i9-9990XE requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Core i9-9990XE targets HEDT. Direct competitor: Core i9-9990XE rivals Threadripper 2970WX.
| Feature | Core i9-9990XE | Core i9-14901E |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Intel UHD Graphics 770 |
| Unlocked | Yes | — |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | Yes |
| Target Use | HEDT | — |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-9990XE was priced at $2000, while the Core i9-14901E came in at $557. On launch pricing ($2000 vs $557), Core i9-14901E was $1443 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9990XE delivers 15.1 pts/$ vs 54.4 pts/$ for the Core i9-14901E — making the Core i9-14901E the 113.2% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-9990XE | Core i9-14901E |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $557-72% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.1 | 54.4+260% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2024 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.















