Core i9-9990XE vs EPYC 7282

Intel

Core i9-9990XE

14 Cores28 Thrd255 WWMax: 5.1 GHz2019
Similar parts
·······
VS
AMD

EPYC 7282

16 Cores32 Thrd120 WWMax: 3.2 GHz2019
EPYC family
·······

Core i9-9990XE vs EPYC 7282 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-9990XE vs EPYC 7282 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-9990XE vs EPYC 7282: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-9990XE

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +30.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

  • Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 64 MB).
  • Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7282, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.1 vs 46.5 PassMark/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $650 MSRP).
  • 112.5% higher power demand at 255W vs 120W.

EPYC 7282

2019

Why buy it

  • +232.5% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 19 MB).
  • Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 44.
  • Costs $1,350 less on MSRP ($650 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Delivers 208.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.5 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($650 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
  • Draws 120W instead of 255W, a 135W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9990XE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower Geekbench multi-core (7,638 vs 16,199).
  • No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-9990XE better than EPYC 7282?
Not really, because they are built for different jobs. EPYC 7282 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-9990XE is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Core i9-9990XE is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 30.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-9990XE is the stronger fit. You are getting 112.1% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 14 cores and 28 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Core i9-9990XE is still the faster CPU overall, but EPYC 7282 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Core i9-9990XE comes in 207.7% more expensive on MSRP at $2,000 MSRP versus $650 MSRP, and it still gives you a 30.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. EPYC 7282 is also 208.1% better value on MSRP (46.5 vs 15.1 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-9990XE makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more multi-core headroom with 14 cores / 28 threads instead of 16/32 and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Core i9-9990XE vs EPYC 7282 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Intel

Core i9-9990XE

The Core i9-9990XE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 255 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,162 points. Launch price was $2,800.

AMD

EPYC 7282

The EPYC 7282 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,201 points. Launch price was $650.

Processing Power

The Core i9-9990XE packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the EPYC 7282 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7282 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-9990XE versus 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7282 — a 45.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-9990XE (base: 4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i9-9990XE uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 7282 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9990XE scores 30,162 against the EPYC 7282's 30,201 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 7282. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,392 vs 1,086, a 24.7% lead for the Core i9-9990XE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,199 vs 7,638 (71.8% advantage for the Core i9-9990XE). L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-9990XE vs 64 MB on the EPYC 7282.

FeatureCore i9-9990XEEPYC 7282
Cores / Threads
14 / 28
16 / 32+14%
Boost Clock
5.1 GHz+59%
3.2 GHz
Base Clock
4 GHz+43%
2.8 GHz
L3 Cache
19.25 MB (total)
64 MB+232%
L2 Cache
1 MB (per core)
8 MB+700%
Process
14 nm
7 nm, 14 nm-50%
Architecture
Skylake (server) (2017−2018)
Zen 2 (2017−2020)
PassMark
30,162
30,201
Cinebench R23 Multi
13,500
Geekbench 6 Single
1,392+28%
1,086
Geekbench 6 Multi
16,199+112%
7,638
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-9990XE uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 7282 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i9-9990XE versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7282 — the EPYC 7282 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7282 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i9-9990XE) vs 8 (EPYC 7282). PCIe lanes: 44 (Core i9-9990XE) vs 128 (EPYC 7282) — the EPYC 7282 offers 84 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-9990XE) and SP3,Rome (EPYC 7282).

FeatureCore i9-9990XEEPYC 7282
Socket
LGA2066
SP3
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 4.0+33%
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
DDR4-3200+20%
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels
4
8+100%
ECC Support
No
Yes
PCIe Lanes
44
128+191%
🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Core i9-9990XE has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i9-9990XE supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-9990XE) vs AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7282). Primary use case: Core i9-9990XE targets HEDT, EPYC 7282 targets Edge Server / Entry Server. Direct competitor: Core i9-9990XE rivals Threadripper 2970WX; EPYC 7282 rivals Xeon Silver 4216.

FeatureCore i9-9990XEEPYC 7282
Integrated GPU
No
No
Unlocked
Yes
No
AVX-512
Yes
No
Virtualization
VT-x, VT-d
AMD-V, SEV
Target Use
HEDT
Edge Server / Entry Server
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Core i9-9990XE was priced at $2000, while the EPYC 7282 came in at $650. On launch pricing ($2000 vs $650), EPYC 7282 was $1350 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9990XE delivers 15.1 pts/$ vs 46.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 7282 — making the EPYC 7282 the 102% better value option.

FeatureCore i9-9990XEEPYC 7282
MSRP
$2000
$650-68%
Performance per Dollar
15.1
46.5+208%
Release Date
2019
2019

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.