
Core i9-9990XE

EPYC 7282
Core i9-9990XE vs EPYC 7282 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Core i9-9990XE vs EPYC 7282 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Core i9-9990XE vs EPYC 7282: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Core i9-9990XE
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (19 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than EPYC 7282, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 15.1 vs 46.5 PassMark/$ ($2,000 MSRP vs $650 MSRP).
- ❌112.5% higher power demand at 255W vs 120W.
EPYC 7282
2019Why buy it
- ✅+232.5% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 19 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 44.
- ✅Costs $1,350 less on MSRP ($650 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 208.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 46.5 vs 15.1 PassMark/$ ($650 MSRP vs $2,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 255W, a 135W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Core i9-9990XE across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (7,638 vs 16,199).
- ❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.
Quick Answers
So, is Core i9-9990XE better than EPYC 7282?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Core i9-9990XE vs EPYC 7282 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-9990XE
The Core i9-9990XE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 19 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture. It features 14 cores and 28 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2066. Thermal design power (TDP): 255 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,162 points. Launch price was $2,800.

EPYC 7282
The EPYC 7282 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 August 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 7 nm, 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Eight-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 30,201 points. Launch price was $650.
Processing Power
The Core i9-9990XE packs 14 cores / 28 threads, while the EPYC 7282 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the EPYC 7282 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.1 GHz on the Core i9-9990XE versus 3.2 GHz on the EPYC 7282 — a 45.8% clock advantage for the Core i9-9990XE (base: 4 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Core i9-9990XE uses the Skylake (server) (2017−2018) architecture (14 nm), while the EPYC 7282 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-9990XE scores 30,162 against the EPYC 7282's 30,201 — a 0.1% lead for the EPYC 7282. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,392 vs 1,086, a 24.7% lead for the Core i9-9990XE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 16,199 vs 7,638 (71.8% advantage for the Core i9-9990XE). L3 cache: 19.25 MB (total) on the Core i9-9990XE vs 64 MB on the EPYC 7282.
| Feature | Core i9-9990XE | EPYC 7282 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 14 / 28 | 16 / 32+14% |
| Boost Clock | 5.1 GHz+59% | 3.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 4 GHz+43% | 2.8 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 19.25 MB (total) | 64 MB+232% |
| L2 Cache | 1 MB (per core) | 8 MB+700% |
| Process | 14 nm | 7 nm, 14 nm-50% |
| Architecture | Skylake (server) (2017−2018) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 30,162 | 30,201 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 13,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,392+28% | 1,086 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 16,199+112% | 7,638 |
Memory & Platform
The Core i9-9990XE uses the LGA2066 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the EPYC 7282 uses SP3 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-2666 on the Core i9-9990XE versus DDR4-3200 on the EPYC 7282 — the EPYC 7282 supports 20% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The EPYC 7282 supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 3100% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 4 (Core i9-9990XE) vs 8 (EPYC 7282). PCIe lanes: 44 (Core i9-9990XE) vs 128 (EPYC 7282) — the EPYC 7282 offers 84 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: X299 (Core i9-9990XE) and SP3,Rome (EPYC 7282).
| Feature | Core i9-9990XE | EPYC 7282 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | LGA2066 | SP3 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 4.0+33% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-2666 | DDR4-3200+20% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 4096 GB+3100% |
| RAM Channels | 4 | 8+100% |
| ECC Support | No | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 44 | 128+191% |
Advanced Features
Only the Core i9-9990XE has an unlocked multiplier for overclocking — a significant advantage for enthusiasts seeking extra performance. Only the Core i9-9990XE supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: VT-x, VT-d (Core i9-9990XE) vs AMD-V, SEV (EPYC 7282). Primary use case: Core i9-9990XE targets HEDT, EPYC 7282 targets Edge Server / Entry Server. Direct competitor: Core i9-9990XE rivals Threadripper 2970WX; EPYC 7282 rivals Xeon Silver 4216.
| Feature | Core i9-9990XE | EPYC 7282 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | Yes | No |
| AVX-512 | Yes | No |
| Virtualization | VT-x, VT-d | AMD-V, SEV |
| Target Use | HEDT | Edge Server / Entry Server |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Core i9-9990XE was priced at $2000, while the EPYC 7282 came in at $650. On launch pricing ($2000 vs $650), EPYC 7282 was $1350 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Core i9-9990XE delivers 15.1 pts/$ vs 46.5 pts/$ for the EPYC 7282 — making the EPYC 7282 the 102% better value option.
| Feature | Core i9-9990XE | EPYC 7282 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2000 | $650-68% |
| Performance per Dollar | 15.1 | 46.5+208% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
















