PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Core i9-14901E vs Xeon Gold 6246R FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Core i9-14901E vs Xeon Gold 6246R: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Core i9-14901E

2024

Why buy it

✅+123.8% higher Geekbench single-core performance for gaming and desktop responsiveness.
✅Draws 65W instead of 205W, a 140W reduction.
✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of LGA3647 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Intel UHD Graphics 770, while Xeon Gold 6246R needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon Gold 6246R, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 48 PCIe lanes.
❌Launch MSRP is still $557 MSRP, while Xeon Gold 6246R mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌No AVX-512 support for niche heavy compute workloads where it can matter.

Xeon Gold 6246R

2020

Why buy it

✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 48 PCIe lanes vs 20.
✅140% more PCIe lanes (48 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅AVX-512 support for select workstation, AI, and scientific workloads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower Geekbench single-core performance for gaming (1,293 vs 2,894).
❌Lower Geekbench multi-core (9,848 vs 14,262).
❌215.4% higher power demand at 205W vs 65W.
❌Older platform position on LGA3647 with DDR4, while Core i9-14901E moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Core i9-14901E can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Quick Answers

So, is Core i9-14901E better than Xeon Gold 6246R?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon Gold 6246R makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Core i9-14901E is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Core i9-14901E is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.2% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Core i9-14901E is the stronger fit. You are getting 44.8% better Geekbench multi-core, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Core i9-14901E is the better buy right now. Core i9-14901E comes in at an unclear MSRP at $557 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.2% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (54.4 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Core i9-14901E makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2020), a healthier platform with LGA1700 and DDR5 instead of LGA3647, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Core i9-14901E vs Xeon Gold 6246R Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Core i9-14901E

The Core i9-14901E is manufactured by Intel. It was released in Julho 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.6 GHz. L3 cache: 36 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4, DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 30,298 points. Launch price was $499.

Xeon Gold 6246R

The Xeon Gold 6246R is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 35.75 MB. L2 cache: 16 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 205 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2933. Passmark benchmark score: 30,468 points. Launch price was $3,286.

⚡

Processing Power

The Core i9-14901E packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon Gold 6246R offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon Gold 6246R has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 5.6 GHz on the Core i9-14901E versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon Gold 6246R — a 30.9% clock advantage for the Core i9-14901E (base: 2.8 GHz vs 3.4 GHz). The Core i9-14901E uses the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture (10 nm), while the Xeon Gold 6246R uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Core i9-14901E scores 30,298 against the Xeon Gold 6246R's 30,468 — a 0.6% lead for the Xeon Gold 6246R. Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 2,894 vs 1,293, a 76.5% lead for the Core i9-14901E that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 14,262 vs 9,848 (36.6% advantage for the Core i9-14901E). L3 cache: 36 MB (total) on the Core i9-14901E vs 35.75 MB on the Xeon Gold 6246R.

Feature	Core i9-14901E	Xeon Gold 6246R
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	5.6 GHz+37%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	2.8 GHz	3.4 GHz+21%
L3 Cache	36 MB (total)	35.75 MB
L2 Cache	2 MB (per core)	16 MB+700%
Process	10 nm-29%	14 nm
Architecture	Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025)	Cascade Lake (2019−2020)
PassMark	30,298	30,468
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	16,000
Geekbench 6 Single	2,894+124%	1,293
Geekbench 6 Multi	14,262+45%	9,848

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Core i9-14901E uses the LGA1700 socket (PCIe 5.0), while the Xeon Gold 6246R uses LGA3647 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR5-5600 on the Core i9-14901E versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon Gold 6246R — the Core i9-14901E supports 90.9% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon Gold 6246R supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 192 GB — 433.3% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Core i9-14901E) vs 6 (Xeon Gold 6246R). PCIe lanes: 20 (Core i9-14901E) vs 48 (Xeon Gold 6246R) — the Xeon Gold 6246R offers 28 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: Intel 600 Series,Intel 700 Series (Core i9-14901E) and Lewisburg (Xeon Gold 6246R).

Feature	Core i9-14901E	Xeon Gold 6246R
Socket	LGA1700	LGA3647
PCIe Generation	PCIe 5.0+67%	PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR5-5600+91%	DDR4-2933
Max RAM Capacity	192 GB	1024 GB+433%
RAM Channels	2	6+200%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	20	48+140%

🔧

Advanced Features

Only the Xeon Gold 6246R supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: Yes (Core i9-14901E) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon Gold 6246R). The Core i9-14901E includes integrated graphics (Intel UHD Graphics 770), while the Xeon Gold 6246R requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon Gold 6246R targets High-frequency Server / Financial. Direct competitor: Xeon Gold 6246R rivals EPYC 7302.

Feature	Core i9-14901E	Xeon Gold 6246R
Integrated GPU	Yes	No
IGPU Model	Intel UHD Graphics 770	—
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	No	Yes
Virtualization	Yes	VT-x, VT-d, EPT
Target Use	—	High-frequency Server / Financial