
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600

Xeon E-2146G
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 vs Xeon E-2146G Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 vs Xeon E-2146G FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 vs Xeon E-2146G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
2018Why buy it
- ✅+0.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅+33.3% larger total L3 cache (16 MB vs 12 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2146G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2146G, which brings 6 cores / 12 threads and 16 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $199 MSRP, while Xeon E-2146G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E-2146G can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Xeon E-2146G.
Xeon E-2146G
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +5.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 6 cores / 12 threads, plus 16 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with UHD Graphics P630, while Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 needs a discrete GPU.
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Yes), unlike Ryzen 5 PRO 2600.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (13,240 vs 13,330).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (12 MB vs 16 MB).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 better than Xeon E-2146G?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 vs Xeon E-2146G Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 PRO 2600
The Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 September 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 13,330 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E-2146G
The Xeon E-2146G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 12 July 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 12 MB (total). L2 cache: 256 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1151. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 13,240 points. Launch price was $317.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 and Xeon E-2146G share an identical 6-core/12-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 versus 4.5 GHz on the Xeon E-2146G — a 14.3% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2146G (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E-2146G uses Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 scores 13,330 against the Xeon E-2146G's 13,240 — a 0.7% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 vs 12 MB (total) on the Xeon E-2146G.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 | Xeon E-2146G |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 3.9 GHz | 4.5 GHz+15% |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.5 GHz+3% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB (total)+33% | 12 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256 kB (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Zen+ (2018−2019) | Coffee Lake-S WS (2018−2019) |
| PassMark | 13,330 | 13,240 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,557 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 6,385 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E-2146G uses LGA1151 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 | Xeon E-2146G |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1151 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR4-2666 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 2600) / Yes (Xeon E-2146G). The Xeon E-2146G includes integrated graphics (UHD Graphics P630), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 2600 | Xeon E-2146G |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | UHD Graphics P630 |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.













