
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

Xeon E3-1265L v4
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U vs Xeon E3-1265L v4 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U vs Xeon E3-1265L v4 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U vs Xeon E3-1265L v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.1% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 35W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,928 vs 6,954).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 6 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E3-1265L v4, which brings 4 cores / 8 threads and 16 PCIe lanes.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Xeon E3-1265L v4 can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Xeon E3-1265L v4
2015Why buy it
- ✅+0.4% higher PassMark.
- ✅+50% larger total L3 cache (6 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 4 cores / 8 threads, plus 16 PCIe lanes vs 0.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (16 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Iris Pro Graphics P6300, while Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $417 MSRP, while Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌133.3% higher power demand at 35W vs 15W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U better than Xeon E3-1265L v4?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U vs Xeon E3-1265L v4 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U
The Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,928 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E3-1265L v4
The Xeon E3-1265L v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Broadwell-DT (2015) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.3 GHz. L3 cache: 6 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1150. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR3L-1333, DDR3L-1600, DDR3L-1866. Passmark benchmark score: 6,954 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Xeon E3-1265L v4 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U versus 3.3 GHz on the Xeon E3-1265L v4 — a 11.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.3 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E3-1265L v4 uses Broadwell-DT (2015) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U scores 6,928 against the Xeon E3-1265L v4's 6,954 — a 0.4% lead for the Xeon E3-1265L v4. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U vs 6 MB (total) on the Xeon E3-1265L v4.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U | Xeon E3-1265L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 4 / 8 | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 3.7 GHz+12% | 3.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 2.1 GHz | 2.3 GHz+10% |
| L3 Cache | 4 MB (total) | 6 MB (total)+50% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+100% | 256K (per core) |
| Process | 12 nm-14% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Picasso (2019−2022) | Broadwell-DT (2015) |
| PassMark | 6,928 | 6,954 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 4,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 900 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 3,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E3-1265L v4 uses LGA1150 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U | Xeon E3-1265L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | FP5 | LGA1150 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | — | DDR3-1866 |
| Max RAM Capacity | — | 32 GB |
| RAM Channels | — | 2 |
| ECC Support | — | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | — | 16 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon E3-1265L v4). The Xeon E3-1265L v4 includes integrated graphics (Iris Pro Graphics P6300), while the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Xeon E3-1265L v4 targets Server.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U | Xeon E3-1265L v4 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | — | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Iris Pro Graphics P6300 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.














