Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U vs Xeon E5-2623 v4

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U vs Xeon E5-2623 v4 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

4 / 8

6,928

+0.9%

Ryzen Threadripper 3970X

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7965WX

Xeon E5-2623 v4

4 / 8

6,868

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U vs Xeon E5-2623 v4 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U vs Xeon E5-2623 v4: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

2019

Why buy it

✅Draws 15W instead of 85W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 10 MB).

Xeon E5-2623 v4

2016

Why buy it

✅+150% larger total L3 cache (10 MB vs 4 MB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (6,868 vs 6,928).
❌466.7% higher power demand at 85W vs 15W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U better than Xeon E5-2623 v4?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-2623 v4 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 0.8% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.9% better PassMark, backed by 4 cores and 8 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you a 0.8% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2019 vs 2016) and more multi-core headroom with 4 cores / 8 threads instead of 4/8. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U vs Xeon E5-2623 v4 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 April 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,928 points. Launch price was $149.

Xeon E5-2623 v4

The Xeon E5-2623 v4 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 20 June 2016 (9 years ago). It is based on the Broadwell (2015−2019) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.2 GHz. L3 cache: 10 MB. L2 cache: 1 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 85 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-1600, DDR4-1866, DDR4-2133. Passmark benchmark score: 6,868 points. Launch price was $444.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U and Xeon E5-2623 v4 share an identical 4-core/8-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U versus 3.2 GHz on the Xeon E5-2623 v4 — a 14.5% clock advantage for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U (base: 2.1 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U uses the Picasso (2019−2022) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-2623 v4 uses Broadwell (2015−2019) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U scores 6,928 against the Xeon E5-2623 v4's 6,868 — a 0.9% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U. L3 cache: 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U vs 10 MB on the Xeon E5-2623 v4.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U	Xeon E5-2623 v4
Cores / Threads	4 / 8	4 / 8
Boost Clock	3.7 GHz+16%	3.2 GHz
Base Clock	2.1 GHz	2.6 GHz+24%
L3 Cache	4 MB (total)	10 MB+150%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+51100%	1 MB
Process	12 nm-14%	14 nm
Architecture	Picasso (2019−2022)	Broadwell (2015−2019)
PassMark	6,928	6,868

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 3500U uses the FP5 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-2623 v4 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.