Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
Xeon W-3225
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE vs Xeon W-3225 Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE vs Xeon W-3225 FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.
Path of Exile 2
Counter-Strike 2
League of Legends
Valorant
Among Us
Apex Legends
ARC Raiders
Baldur's Gate 3
Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE vs Xeon W-3225: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,008 less on MSRP ($311 MSRP vs $1,319 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 321.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 58.4 vs 13.8 PassMark/$ ($311 MSRP vs $1,319 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 160W, a 125W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Graphics, while Xeon W-3225 needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon W-3225 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower Cinebench R23 multi-core (1,504 vs 11,500).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon W-3225, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads and 64 PCIe lanes.
Xeon W-3225
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads, plus 64 PCIe lanes vs 16.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (64 vs 16) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.8 vs 58.4 PassMark/$ ($1,319 MSRP vs $311 MSRP).
- ❌357.1% higher power demand at 160W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Quick Answers
So, is Xeon W-3225 better than Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE vs Xeon W-3225 Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.
Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE
The Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 June 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 18,155 points. Launch price was $299.
Xeon W-3225
The Xeon W-3225 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 3 June 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Cascade Lake (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 16.5 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA3647. Thermal design power (TDP): 160 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2666. Passmark benchmark score: 18,251 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon W-3225 offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon W-3225 has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE versus 4.4 GHz on the Xeon W-3225 — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.7 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE uses the Cezanne (2021−2025) architecture (7 nm), while the Xeon W-3225 uses Cascade Lake (2019−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE scores 18,155 against the Xeon W-3225's 18,251 — a 0.5% lead for the Xeon W-3225. Cinebench R23 multi-core: 1,504 vs 11,500 (153.7% advantage for the Xeon W-3225). Geekbench 6 single-core — the metric most relevant to gaming — records 1,900 vs 1,150, a 49.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE that directly translates to higher frame rates. Multi-core Geekbench: 6,700 vs 9,100 (30.4% advantage for the Xeon W-3225). L3 cache: 16 MB on the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE vs 16.5 MB on the Xeon W-3225.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 6 / 12 | 8 / 16+33% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.4 GHz | 3.7 GHz+9% |
| L3 Cache | 16 MB | 16.5 MB+3% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core)+6300% | 8 MB |
| Process | 7 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Cezanne (2021−2025) | Cascade Lake (2019−2020) |
| PassMark | 18,155 | 18,251 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | 1,504 | 11,500+665% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | 1,900+65% | 1,150 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | 6,700 | 9,100+36% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon W-3225 uses LGA3647 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon W-3225 — the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon W-3225 supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 1500% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE) vs 6 (Xeon W-3225). PCIe lanes: 16 (Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE) vs 64 (Xeon W-3225) — the Xeon W-3225 offers 48 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AM4 (Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE) and C621 (Xeon W-3225).
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA3647 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 3.0 | PCIe 5.0+67% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+9% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 64 GB | 1024 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 6+200% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 16 | 64+300% |
Advanced Features
Neither processor supports overclocking. Only the Xeon W-3225 supports AVX-512 instructions — important for machine learning and scientific applications. Virtualization support: AMD-V (Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE) vs VT-x, VT-d, EPT (Xeon W-3225). The Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE includes integrated graphics (Radeon Graphics), while the Xeon W-3225 requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE targets Workstation, Xeon W-3225 targets Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE rivals Ryzen 5 3600; Xeon W-3225 rivals Ryzen Threadripper 2920X.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | Yes | No |
| IGPU Model | Radeon Graphics | None |
| Unlocked | No | No |
| AVX-512 | No | Yes |
| Virtualization | AMD-V | VT-x, VT-d, EPT |
| Target Use | Workstation | Workstation |
Value Analysis
At launch, the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE was priced at $311, while the Xeon W-3225 came in at $1319. On launch pricing ($311 vs $1319), Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE was $1008 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE delivers 58.4 pts/$ vs 13.8 pts/$ for the Xeon W-3225 — making the Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE the 123.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE | Xeon W-3225 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $311-76% | $1319 |
| Performance per Dollar | 58.4+323% | 13.8 |
| Release Date | 2021 | 2019 |
Affiliate Disclosure
ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.
Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.
You May Also Compare
Similar CPU comparisons based on Ryzen 5 PRO 5650GE and Xeon W-3225
