Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS vs Xeon E-2378G

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS vs Xeon E-2378G Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS

6 / 12

21,408

+1.2%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5975WX

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E-2378G

8 / 16

21,153

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS vs Xeon E-2378G FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS vs Xeon E-2378G: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS

2024

Why buy it

✅+1.2% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 28W instead of 80W, a 52W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of LGA1200 and DDR4.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon E-2378G across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E-2378G, which brings 8 cores / 16 threads.

Xeon E-2378G

2021

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +5.3% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 8 cores / 16 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (21,153 vs 21,408).
❌185.7% higher power demand at 80W vs 28W.
❌Older platform position on LGA1200 with DDR4, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS better than Xeon E-2378G?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E-2378G makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.2% better PassMark, backed by 6 cores and 12 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS still makes the most sense overall. Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS comes in at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it still gives you 1.2% better PassMark.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2024 vs 2021), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of LGA1200, and more multi-core headroom with 6 cores / 12 threads instead of 8/16. That gives you a healthier platform runway for motherboard, RAM, and later CPU upgrades.

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS vs Xeon E-2378G Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS

The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.9 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,408 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E-2378G

The Xeon E-2378G is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Rocket Lake-E (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2.8 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1200. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 21,153 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS packs 6 cores / 12 threads, while the Xeon E-2378G offers 8 cores / 16 threads — the Xeon E-2378G has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.9 GHz on the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS versus 5.1 GHz on the Xeon E-2378G — a 4% clock advantage for the Xeon E-2378G (base: 3.5 GHz vs 2.8 GHz). The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS uses the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture (4 nm), while the Xeon E-2378G uses Rocket Lake-E (2021) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS scores 21,408 against the Xeon E-2378G's 21,153 — a 1.2% lead for the Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS. Both processors carry 16 MB (total) of L3 cache.

Feature	Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS	Xeon E-2378G
Cores / Threads	6 / 12	8 / 16+33%
Boost Clock	4.9 GHz	5.1 GHz+4%
Base Clock	3.5 GHz+25%	2.8 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	1 MB (per core)	512K (per core)+51100%
Process	4 nm-71%	14 nm
Architecture	Hawk Point (2024−2025)	Rocket Lake-E (2021)
PassMark	21,408+1%	21,153

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 5 PRO 8640HS uses the FP7 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon E-2378G uses LGA1200 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.