Ryzen 7 2700 vs Xeon E5-4667 v3

Ryzen 7 2700 vs Xeon E5-4667 v3 Performance Spectrum

Ryzen 7 2700

8 / 16

15,633

+1.5%

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX

Ryzen 9 8940HX

Ryzen 9 9950X3D

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Xeon E5-4667 v3

16 / 32

15,397

0.0%

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 2700 vs Xeon E5-4667 v3 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 2700 vs Xeon E5-4667 v3: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 2700

2018

Why buy it

✅Draws 65W instead of 135W, a 70W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 40 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon E5-4667 v3, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 52.3 vs 120.3 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $128 MSRP).

Xeon E5-4667 v3

2015

Why buy it

✅+150% larger total L3 cache (40 MB vs 16 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.
✅Costs $171 less on MSRP ($128 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
✅Delivers 130.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 120.3 vs 52.3 PassMark/$ ($128 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (15,397 vs 15,633).
❌107.7% higher power demand at 135W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 2700 better than Xeon E5-4667 v3?

Not really, because they are built for different jobs. Xeon E5-4667 v3 makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 2700 is the more practical desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and everyday use.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 2700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 2700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 1.5% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 2700 is still the faster CPU overall, but Xeon E5-4667 v3 is easier to justify if budget matters more than peak performance. Ryzen 7 2700 comes in 133.6% more expensive on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $128 MSRP, and it still gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Xeon E5-4667 v3 is also 130.1% better value on MSRP (120.3 vs 52.3 PassMark/$), which is why it can still make sense for tighter-budget builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 2700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2015) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 16/32. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 7 2700 vs Xeon E5-4667 v3 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

Ryzen 7 2700

The Ryzen 7 2700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,633 points. Launch price was $299.

Xeon E5-4667 v3

The Xeon E5-4667 v3 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It is based on the Haswell-EP (2014−2015) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 2.9 GHz. L3 cache: 40 MB (total). L2 cache: 256K (per core). Built on 22 nm process technology. Socket: LGA2011. Thermal design power (TDP): 135 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,397 points. Launch price was $800.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 2700 packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon E5-4667 v3 has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700 versus 2.9 GHz on the Xeon E5-4667 v3 — a 34.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 2700 (base: 3.2 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 2700 uses the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture (12 nm), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses Haswell-EP (2014−2015) (22 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 2700 scores 15,633 against the Xeon E5-4667 v3's 15,397 — a 1.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 2700. L3 cache: 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700 vs 40 MB (total) on the Xeon E5-4667 v3.

Feature	Ryzen 7 2700	Xeon E5-4667 v3
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.1 GHz+41%	2.9 GHz
Base Clock	3.2 GHz+60%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	16 MB (total)	40 MB (total)+150%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)+100%	256K (per core)
Process	12 nm-45%	22 nm
Architecture	Zen+ (2018−2019)	Haswell-EP (2014−2015)
PassMark	15,633+2%	15,397

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 2700 uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 3.0), while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 uses LGA2011 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

Feature	Ryzen 7 2700	Xeon E5-4667 v3
Socket	AM4	LGA2011
PCIe Generation	PCIe 3.0	PCIe 3.0

💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 2700 was priced at $299, while the Xeon E5-4667 v3 came in at $128. On launch pricing ($299 vs $128), Xeon E5-4667 v3 was $171 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 2700 delivers 52.3 pts/$ vs 120.3 pts/$ for the Xeon E5-4667 v3 — making the Xeon E5-4667 v3 the 78.8% better value option.

Feature	Ryzen 7 2700	Xeon E5-4667 v3
MSRP	$299	$128-57%
Performance per Dollar	52.3	120.3+130%
Release Date	2018	2015

Search Ryzen 7 2700 on Amazon

Search Xeon E5-4667 v3 on Amazon

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.