Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700

AMD

Ryzen 7 1700X

8 Cores16 Thrd95 WWMax: 3.8 GHz2017
Ryzen family
·······
VS
AMD

Ryzen 7 2700

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.1 GHz2018
Ryzen family
·······

Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700 Performance Spectrum

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700 FPS Benchmarks

Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.

Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict

See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.

Ryzen 7 1700X

2017

Why buy it

  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 2700 across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (15,623 vs 15,633).
  • Lower PassMark per dollar, at 39.2 vs 52.3 PassMark/$ ($399 MSRP vs $299 MSRP).
  • 46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 2700

2018

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +7.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Costs $100 less on MSRP ($299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Delivers 33.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 52.3 vs 39.2 PassMark/$ ($299 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
  • Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 2700 better than Ryzen 7 1700X?
Yes. Ryzen 7 2700 is the better all-around CPU here. It gives you a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data, 0.1% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which is enough to make it the stronger overall pick.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 2700 is the better pick. According to our tests, it delivers 7.5% more average FPS across 50 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 2700 is the stronger fit. You are getting 0.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 2700 is the better buy right now. Ryzen 7 2700 comes in $100 cheaper on MSRP at $299 MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and it still gives you a 7.5% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 33.5% better value on MSRP (52.3 vs 39.2 PassMark/$), so you are getting the faster CPU without taking a value hit on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 2700 makes more sense long term for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2018 vs 2017) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom is more likely to matter as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Ryzen 7 1700X vs Ryzen 7 2700 Technical Specifications

Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.

AMD

Ryzen 7 1700X

The Ryzen 7 1700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2 March 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.4 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16384 kB. L2 cache: 4096 kB. Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 15,623 points. Launch price was $399.

AMD

Ryzen 7 2700

The Ryzen 7 2700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 April 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen+ (2018−2019) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 15,633 points. Launch price was $299.

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 1700X and Ryzen 7 2700 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen 7 1700X versus 4.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 2700 — a 7.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 2700 (base: 3.4 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 1700X uses the Zen (2017−2020) architecture (14 nm), while the Ryzen 7 2700 uses Zen+ (2018−2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 1700X scores 15,623 against the Ryzen 7 2700's 15,633 — a 0.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 2700. L3 cache: 16384 kB on the Ryzen 7 1700X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 2700.

FeatureRyzen 7 1700XRyzen 7 2700
Cores / Threads
8 / 16
8 / 16
Boost Clock
3.8 GHz
4.1 GHz+8%
Base Clock
3.4 GHz+6%
3.2 GHz
L3 Cache
16384 kB
16 MB (total)
L2 Cache
4096 kB+700%
512K (per core)
Process
14 nm
12 nm-14%
Architecture
Zen (2017−2020)
Zen+ (2018−2019)
PassMark
15,623
15,633
🧠

Memory & Platform

Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 3.0.

FeatureRyzen 7 1700XRyzen 7 2700
Socket
AM4
AM4
PCIe Generation
PCIe 3.0
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-2666
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
💰

Value Analysis

At launch, the Ryzen 7 1700X was priced at $399, while the Ryzen 7 2700 came in at $299. On launch pricing ($399 vs $299), Ryzen 7 2700 was $100 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 1700X delivers 39.2 pts/$ vs 52.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 2700 — making the Ryzen 7 2700 the 28.7% better value option.

FeatureRyzen 7 1700XRyzen 7 2700
MSRP
$399
$299-25%
Performance per Dollar
39.2
52.3+33%
Release Date
2017
2018

Affiliate Disclosure

ChipVERSUS is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to Amazon.com. We may earn a commission on qualifying purchases made through our links. This comes at no additional cost to you and helps support our work in providing comprehensive PC building guides and tools.

Amazon and the Amazon logo are trademarks of Amazon.com, Inc. or its affiliates.