
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 5825C
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 87.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 36.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 5825C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 7 5825C
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,561 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen 7 5825C
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 87.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 36.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon Vega 8, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 5825C can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,561 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 36.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen 7 5825C?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 5825C |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 148 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 5825C |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 127 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 106 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 5825C |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 316 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 219 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 5825C |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 345 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 7 5825C


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen 7 5825C
Ryzen 7 5825C
The Ryzen 7 5825C is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 5 May 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 14,561 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 7 5825C share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen 7 5825C — a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 5825C (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 5825C uses Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen 7 5825C's 14,561 — a 42.5% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 5825C.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 5825C |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Barcelo (Zen 3) (2022−2023) |
| PassMark | 22,430+54% | 14,561 |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 9,551 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,961 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 7,145 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 5825C uses FP6 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Ryzen 7 5825C) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and SoC (Ryzen 7 5825C).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 5825C |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+200% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / Yes (Ryzen 7 5825C). The Ryzen 7 5825C includes integrated graphics (Radeon Vega 8), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 5825C |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon Vega 8 |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 5825C debuted at $400. On MSRP ($329 vs $400), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $71 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 36.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 5825C — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 60.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 5825C |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-18% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+87% | 36.4 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











