PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 22,897).
❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7735HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7735HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7735HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Ryzen 7 7735HS

2023

Why buy it

✅+2.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Ryzen 7 7735HS

2023

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +25.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅+2.1% higher PassMark.
✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 680M, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 22,897).
❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 7735HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7735HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 7 7735HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 7735HS better than Ryzen 7 3700X?

It depends on what matters more to you. For gaming, Ryzen 7 3700X is ahead with a 25.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. For rendering, compiling, streaming, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7735HS pulls ahead with 2.1% better PassMark. Ryzen 7 3700X also has the bigger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 7735HS is the better fit. You are getting 2.1% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 7735HS is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen 7 7735HS is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you 2.1% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Ryzen 7 3700X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 25.9% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 3700X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen 7 7735HS is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2023 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FP7 and DDR5 instead of AM4, and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Ryzen 7 7735HS Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen 7 7735HS
1080p
low	200 FPS	246 FPS
medium	163 FPS	230 FPS
high	137 FPS	192 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	165 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	217 FPS
medium	121 FPS	184 FPS
high	100 FPS	149 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	131 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	152 FPS
medium	71 FPS	129 FPS
high	56 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	87 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Ryzen 7 7735HS

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen 7 7735HS
1080p
low	561 FPS	464 FPS
medium	525 FPS	392 FPS
high	428 FPS	339 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	296 FPS
1440p
low	545 FPS	397 FPS
medium	471 FPS	347 FPS
high	394 FPS	306 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	258 FPS
4K
low	350 FPS	274 FPS
medium	304 FPS	246 FPS
high	274 FPS	229 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	195 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Ryzen 7 7735HS

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen 7 7735HS
1080p
low	561 FPS	572 FPS
medium	561 FPS	572 FPS
high	561 FPS	494 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	403 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	572 FPS
medium	561 FPS	520 FPS
high	538 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	365 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	452 FPS
medium	394 FPS	380 FPS
high	343 FPS	333 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	272 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Ryzen 7 7735HS

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen 7 7735HS
1080p
low	561 FPS	572 FPS
medium	561 FPS	572 FPS
high	561 FPS	572 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	572 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	572 FPS
medium	561 FPS	572 FPS
high	561 FPS	572 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	510 FPS
4K
low	561 FPS	533 FPS
medium	501 FPS	487 FPS
high	447 FPS	434 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	376 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Ryzen 7 7735HS

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 7 7735HS

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Ryzen 7 7735HS

The Ryzen 7 7735HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 1 April 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt-HS Refresh (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.75 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 22,897 points. Launch price was $299.

⚡

Processing Power

Both the Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 7 7735HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.75 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7735HS — a 7.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7735HS (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7735HS uses Rembrandt-HS Refresh (2023) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen 7 7735HS's 22,897 — a 2.1% lead for the Ryzen 7 7735HS. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7735HS.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen 7 7735HS
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	8 / 16
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	4.75 GHz+8%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+12%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB+100%	16 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	512 kB (per core)
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	6 nm-14%
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Rembrandt-HS Refresh (2023)
PassMark	22,430	22,897+2%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	13,500
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,900
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	8,800

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7735HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus LPDDR5-6400 on the Ryzen 7 7735HS — the Ryzen 7 7735HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 20 (Ryzen 7 7735HS) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and SoC (Ryzen 7 7735HS).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen 7 7735HS
Socket	AM4	FP7
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	LPDDR5-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+100%	64 GB
RAM Channels	2	2
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24+20%	20

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / AMD-V (Ryzen 7 7735HS). The Ryzen 7 7735HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 680M), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 7 7735HS targets High Performance Laptop.