
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 7840U
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 11.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 61.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 24,547).
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840U moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 7840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen 7 7840U
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 11.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 61.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +4.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 7840U across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 24,547).
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 7840U moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 7840U better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 257 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 237 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 228 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 477 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 342 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 306 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 364 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 206 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 595 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 526 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 452 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 345 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 614 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 614 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 614 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 614 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 549 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 560 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 447 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 7 7840U


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen 7 7840U
Ryzen 7 7840U
The Ryzen 7 7840U is manufactured by AMD. It was released in Maio 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-5600. Passmark benchmark score: 24,547 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 7 7840U share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 7840U — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 7840U (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 7840U uses Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen 7 7840U's 24,547 — a 9% lead for the Ryzen 7 7840U. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 7840U.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Phoenix-U (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 24,547+9% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 7840U uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 7840U debuted at $400. On MSRP ($329 vs $400), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $71 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 61.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 7840U — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 10.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 7840U |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-18% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+11% | 61.4 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











