
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.1% higher average FPS across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Delivers 52.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 44.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
2017Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,699 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.7 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
2017Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +36.1% higher average FPS across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Delivers 52.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 44.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 41 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (14,699 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.7 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen 7 PRO 1700?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 253 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 167 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 170 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 156 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 124 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 295 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 264 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 214 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 367 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 367 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 313 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
Ryzen 7 PRO 1700
The Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 29 June 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 3.7 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 14,699 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.7 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 — a 17.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700's 14,699 — a 41.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+19% | 3.7 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+20% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 22,430+53% | 14,699 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 debuted at $329. On MSRP ($329 vs $329), the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 is $0 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 44.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 41.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 1700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $329 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+53% | 44.7 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











