
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 250
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 54.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 250 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
2025Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,789 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 54.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen 7 PRO 250
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +3.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 25.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 54.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $400 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 250 moves to FP8 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,789 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 54.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($400 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen 7 PRO 250?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 238 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 134 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 492 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 408 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 328 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 281 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 284 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 248 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 214 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 522 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 457 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 343 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 545 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 449 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 385 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 250


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen 7 PRO 250
Ryzen 7 PRO 250
The Ryzen 7 PRO 250 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 21,789 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 250 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 uses Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 250's 21,789 — a 2.9% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 7 PRO 250.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Hawk Point-U (Zen 4) (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 22,430+3% | 21,789 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 uses FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 debuted at $400. On MSRP ($329 vs $400), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $71 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 54.5 pts/$ for the Ryzen 7 PRO 250 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 22.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 250 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-18% | $400 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+25% | 54.5 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











