
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 26,864).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
2024Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 28W instead of 65W, a 37W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 26,864).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌132.1% higher power demand at 65W vs 28W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 255 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 198 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 170 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 227 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 103 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 91 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 469 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 301 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 410 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 265 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 270 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 202 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 594 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 622 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 525 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 451 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 521 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 406 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 345 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 672 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 672 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 633 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 559 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 501 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 446 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 384 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS
The Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 April 2024 (1 year ago). It is based on the Hawk Point (2024−2025) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 28 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 26,864 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS — a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses Hawk Point (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS's 26,864 — a 18% lead for the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Hawk Point (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 26,864+20% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS uses FP7 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 7 PRO 8840HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











