
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 4900H
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 4900H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Ryzen 9 4900H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,887 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen 9 4900H
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +26.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 4900H mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,887 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen 9 4900H?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 178 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 94 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 153 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 98 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 393 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 318 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 338 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 271 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 185 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 462 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 346 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 282 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 472 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 472 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 455 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 442 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 327 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 9 4900H


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen 9 4900H
Ryzen 9 4900H
The Ryzen 9 4900H is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 16 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 54 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 18,887 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 9 4900H share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900H — identical boost frequencies (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 9 4900H uses Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen 9 4900H's 18,887 — a 17.2% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900H.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.4 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+300% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Renoir-H (Zen 2) (2020) |
| PassMark | 22,430+19% | 18,887 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 4900H uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 4900H |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












