
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 4900HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 4900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 4900HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 4900HS
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Vega 8, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,793 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen 9 4900HS
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +28.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+300% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 8 MB).
- ✅200% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 8) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Vega 8, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 4900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 4900HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (18,793 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (8 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen 9 4900HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 353 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 225 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 198 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 171 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 470 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 415 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 391 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 281 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 470 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 470 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 470 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 470 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 429 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 458 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 415 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 310 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 9 4900HS


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen 9 4900HS
Ryzen 9 4900HS
The Ryzen 9 4900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 March 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 8 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-4266. Passmark benchmark score: 18,793 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 9 4900HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 4900HS — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 9 4900HS uses Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen 9 4900HS's 18,793 — a 17.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 8 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 4900HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+2% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+20% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+300% | 8 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Renoir (Zen 2) (2020) |
| PassMark | 22,430+19% | 18,793 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 4900HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Ryzen 9 4900HS) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 16 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | LPDDR4-4266 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | No |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+200% | 8 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 4900HS). The Ryzen 9 4900HS includes integrated graphics (Vega 8), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 4900HS targets Mobile High-End.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 4900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Vega 8 |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Mobile High-End |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












