
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 61.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 33,912).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
Ryzen 9 5900
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen 9 5900
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10.4% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 61.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $549 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 5900 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 33,912).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($549 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 5900 better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 47 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 734 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 625 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 495 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 437 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 608 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 440 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 361 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 358 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 314 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 253 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 805 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 627 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 543 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 449 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 690 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 543 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 393 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 490 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 359 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 296 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 848 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 848 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 836 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 744 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 848 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 760 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 665 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 570 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 494 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 426 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 9 5900


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen 9 5900
Ryzen 9 5900
The Ryzen 9 5900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 33,912 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 5900 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 5900 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900 — a 6.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen 9 5900's 33,912 — a 40.8% lead for the Ryzen 9 5900. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 5900.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+20% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 33,912+51% |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 5900). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 5900 targets OEM Gaming.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | OEM Gaming |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 5900 debuted at $549. On MSRP ($329 vs $549), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $220 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 61.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 5900 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 9.9% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-40% | $549 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+10% | 61.8 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2021 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











