
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 5900HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 5900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Ryzen 9 5900HS
2021Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,214 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen 9 5900HS
2021Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +16.6% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 65W, a 30W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 5900HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌85.7% higher power demand at 65W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (21,214 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen 9 5900HS?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 171 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 123 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 79 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 411 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 351 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 355 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 280 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 239 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 223 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 183 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 530 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 496 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 465 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 359 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 400 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 300 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 241 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 530 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 530 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 530 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 530 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 516 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 373 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 9 5900HS


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen 9 5900HS
Ryzen 9 5900HS
The Ryzen 9 5900HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 12 January 2021 (4 years ago). It is based on the Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.6 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: FP6. Thermal design power (TDP): 35 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 21,214 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 9 5900HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.6 GHz on the Ryzen 9 5900HS — a 4.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 5900HS (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 9 5900HS uses Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen 9 5900HS's 21,214 — a 5.6% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 5900HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.6 GHz+5% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+20% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Cezanne-HS (Zen 3) (2021) |
| PassMark | 22,430+6% | 21,214 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 5900HS uses FP6 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 5900HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP6 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











