
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9900X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 56,301).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 94.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 9900X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9900X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 37.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores), while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌82.1% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen 9 9900X3D
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 120W, a 55W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Delivers 37.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 94.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($599 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on AM5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores), while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 9900X3D across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 56,301).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 94.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 9900X3D moves to AM5 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 9900X3D can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌82.1% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌84.6% higher power demand at 120W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 9900X3D better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 9900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 100 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 9900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 824 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 670 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 410 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 662 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 335 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 233 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 9900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 890 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 722 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 649 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 559 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 511 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 434 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 510 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 377 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 316 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 9900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 1116 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 1001 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 878 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 792 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 872 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 766 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 673 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 584 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 637 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 566 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 503 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 435 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 9 9900X3D


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen 9 9900X3D
Ryzen 9 9900X3D
The Ryzen 9 9900X3D is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Ridge (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.4 GHz, with boost up to 5.5 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: AM5. Thermal design power (TDP): 120 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 56,301 points. Launch price was $599.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 9900X3D offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 9900X3D has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5.5 GHz on the Ryzen 9 9900X3D — a 22.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 9900X3D (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4.4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 9 9900X3D uses Granite Ridge (2024−2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen 9 9900X3D's 56,301 — a 86% lead for the Ryzen 9 9900X3D. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen 9 9900X3D.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 9900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.5 GHz+25% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4.4 GHz+22% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 128 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Granite Ridge (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 56,301+151% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 3,400 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 26,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 9900X3D uses AM5 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 9900X3D — the Ryzen 9 9900X3D supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 9 9900X3D supports up to 192 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 40% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and X670,X670E,X870,X870E (Ryzen 9 9900X3D).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 9900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 5.0+25% |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 192 GB+50% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 9900X3D). The Ryzen 9 9900X3D includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores)), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Primary use case: Ryzen 9 9900X3D targets High End Gaming/Creation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 9900X3D rivals Core Ultra 9 285K.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 9900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | AMD Radeon Graphics (2 Cores) |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | High End Gaming/Creation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 9900X3D debuted at $599. On MSRP ($329 vs $599), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $270 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 94.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 9900X3D — making the Ryzen 9 9900X3D the 31.8% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 9900X3D |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-45% | $599 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2 | 94.0+38% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











