
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 8.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 62.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 31,251).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 3900.
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Ryzen 7 3700X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 62.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $170 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 8.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 62.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +6.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Includes a boxed cooler (Wraith Prism), unlike Ryzen 7 3700X.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 31,251).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌No boxed cooler included, unlike Ryzen 9 PRO 3900.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 62.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($499 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 188 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 122 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 156 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 44 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 589 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 506 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 446 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 374 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 312 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 283 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 256 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 229 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 781 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 690 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 615 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 539 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 664 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 264 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 781 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 781 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 781 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 706 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 781 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 710 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 609 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 538 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 398 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 9 PRO 3900


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
Ryzen 9 PRO 3900
The Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 September 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Zen 2 (2017−2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.1 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 6 MB. Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 31,251 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 uses Zen 2 (2017−2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900's 31,251 — a 32.9% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+2% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+16% | 3.1 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 6 MB+1100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Zen 2 (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 31,251+39% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 17,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,688 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,000 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. Both provide 24 PCIe lanes. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and X570,B550,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 24 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / AMD-V (Ryzen 9 PRO 3900). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 targets Professional Content Creation. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 rivals Core i9-10900.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V |
| Target Use | — | Professional Content Creation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 debuted at $499. On MSRP ($329 vs $499), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $170 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 62.6 pts/$ for the Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 8.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 3900 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-34% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+9% | 62.6 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











