
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 34,549).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.2% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
2022Why buy it
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.2% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 34,549).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 544 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 381 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 460 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 385 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 271 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 249 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 221 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 845 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 670 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 586 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 494 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 676 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 535 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 460 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 387 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 480 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 398 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 354 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 293 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 864 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 864 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 836 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 743 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 864 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 757 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 661 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 566 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 626 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 490 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 423 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 9 PRO 5945


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
Ryzen 9 PRO 5945
The Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 4 April 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Vermeer (2020−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3 GHz, with boost up to 4.7 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 34,549 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.7 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 — a 6.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 uses Vermeer (2020−2025) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945's 34,549 — a 42.5% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 64 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 5945.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.7 GHz+7% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+20% | 3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Vermeer (2020−2025) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 34,549+54% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 23,200 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,175 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 12,500 |
Memory & Platform
Both processors use the AM4 socket with PCIe 4.0. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and X570,B550,A520,X470,B450 (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | AM4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 128 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / AMD-V (SVM) (Ryzen 9 PRO 5945). Primary use case: Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 targets High-end Gaming. Direct competitor: Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 rivals Core i9-12900.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 5945 |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | No |
| Virtualization | — | AMD-V (SVM) |
| Target Use | — | High-end Gaming |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











