
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 27,318).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
2023Why buy it
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅20% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 20) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 8W instead of 65W, a 57W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7/FP8 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅Integrated graphics onboard with Radeon 780M, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 27,318).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌712.5% higher power demand at 65W vs 8W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS moves to FP7/FP8 and DDR5.
- ❌No integrated graphics, while Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS can still boot and troubleshoot without a discrete GPU.
Trade-offs
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 204 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 176 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 236 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 193 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 157 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 139 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 136 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 92 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 513 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 421 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 363 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 323 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 285 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 295 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 253 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 647 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 546 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 541 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 464 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 541 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 473 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 419 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 355 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 683 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 683 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 683 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 683 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 660 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 573 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 572 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 511 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 394 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS
The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 13 June 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.2 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB. L2 cache: 8 MB. Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP7/FP8. Thermal design power (TDP): 8 MB + 16 MB. Passmark benchmark score: 27,318 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5.2 GHz on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — a 16.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS's 27,318 — a 19.7% lead for the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 16 MB on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.2 GHz+18% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 8 MB+1500% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Phoenix-HS (Zen 4) (2023) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 27,318+22% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 16,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,605 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 10,348 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS uses FP7/FP8 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-5600 on the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS — the Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 64 GB — 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Both feature 2-channel memory with ECC support. PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 20 (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS) — the Ryzen 7 3700X offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and SoC (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7/FP8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5600+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+100% | 64 GB |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 2 |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24+20% | 20 |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / Yes (Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS). The Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS includes integrated graphics (Radeon 780M), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen 9 PRO 7940HS |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | Yes |
| IGPU Model | — | Radeon 780M |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | Yes |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











