PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 41,834).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max 390 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI Max 390 moves to FP11 and DDR5.

Ryzen AI Max 390

2025

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 8050S, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Ryzen AI Max 390

2025

Why buy it

✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Draws 55W instead of 65W, a 10W reduction.
✅Newer platform on FP11 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅16.7% more PCIe lanes (28 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
✅Integrated graphics onboard with AMD Radeon 8050S, while Ryzen 7 3700X needs a discrete GPU.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 41,834).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen AI Max 390 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
❌18.2% higher power demand at 65W vs 55W.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen AI Max 390 moves to FP11 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Fewer obvious downsides in this matchup outside of normal market pricing swings.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen AI Max 390 better than Ryzen 7 3700X?

Yes. Ryzen AI Max 390 is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 2.6% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data, 86.5% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen AI Max 390 is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 2.6% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen AI Max 390 is the better fit. You are getting 86.5% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen AI Max 390 is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen AI Max 390 is at an unclear MSRP at unclear MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you a 2.6% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 3700X is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen AI Max 390 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with FP11 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Ryzen AI Max 390 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen AI Max 390
1080p
low	200 FPS	265 FPS
medium	163 FPS	241 FPS
high	137 FPS	205 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	178 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	252 FPS
medium	121 FPS	206 FPS
high	100 FPS	162 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	146 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	175 FPS
medium	71 FPS	143 FPS
high	56 FPS	107 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	96 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Ryzen AI Max 390

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen AI Max 390
1080p
low	561 FPS	671 FPS
medium	525 FPS	578 FPS
high	428 FPS	435 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	376 FPS
1440p
low	545 FPS	564 FPS
medium	471 FPS	503 FPS
high	394 FPS	392 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	312 FPS
4K
low	350 FPS	318 FPS
medium	304 FPS	288 FPS
high	274 FPS	255 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	219 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Ryzen AI Max 390

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen AI Max 390
1080p
low	561 FPS	769 FPS
medium	561 FPS	602 FPS
high	561 FPS	526 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	442 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	668 FPS
medium	561 FPS	527 FPS
high	538 FPS	457 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	387 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	478 FPS
medium	394 FPS	395 FPS
high	343 FPS	351 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	292 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Ryzen AI Max 390

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen AI Max 390
1080p
low	561 FPS	1046 FPS
medium	561 FPS	953 FPS
high	561 FPS	833 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	751 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	838 FPS
medium	561 FPS	746 FPS
high	561 FPS	652 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	566 FPS
4K
low	561 FPS	616 FPS
medium	501 FPS	552 FPS
high	447 FPS	487 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	422 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Ryzen AI Max 390

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen AI Max 390

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Ryzen AI Max 390

The Ryzen AI Max 390 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 6 January 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Strix Halo (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: FP11. Thermal design power (TDP): 55 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 41,834 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen AI Max 390 offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen AI Max 390 has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5 GHz on the Ryzen AI Max 390 — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen AI Max 390 (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen AI Max 390 uses Strix Halo (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen AI Max 390's 41,834 — a 60.4% lead for the Ryzen AI Max 390. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen AI Max 390.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen AI Max 390
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	5 GHz+14%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+12%	3.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB	64 MB (total)+100%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Strix Halo (2025)
PassMark	22,430	41,834+87%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen AI Max 390 uses FP11 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 8000 on the Ryzen AI Max 390 — the Ryzen AI Max 390 supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. Both support up to 128 GB of RAM. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 4 (Ryzen AI Max 390). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 28 (Ryzen AI Max 390) — the Ryzen AI Max 390 offers 4 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and Strix Halo (Ryzen AI Max 390).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen AI Max 390
Socket	AM4	FP11
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	8000+199900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+104857500%	128
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	28+17%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen AI Max 390). The Ryzen AI Max 390 includes integrated graphics (AMD Radeon 8050S), while the Ryzen 7 3700X requires a dedicated GPU. Direct competitor: Ryzen AI Max 390 rivals Apple M4 Max.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen AI Max 390
Integrated GPU	No	Yes
IGPU Model	—	AMD Radeon 8050S
Unlocked	—	Yes
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen AI Max 390 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($329 vs $0), the Ryzen AI Max 390 is $329 cheaper.