
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Embedded R1600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +360.3% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded R1600 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.
Ryzen Embedded R1600
2020Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,276 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen Embedded R1600
2020Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +360.3% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 25W instead of 65W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded R1600 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌160% higher power demand at 65W vs 25W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (3,276 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen Embedded R1600?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 66 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 41 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 32 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 65 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 75 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 55 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 54 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 25 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 82 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 82 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Embedded R1600


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen Embedded R1600
Ryzen Embedded R1600
The Ryzen Embedded R1600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 3,276 points. Launch price was $69.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.1 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1600 — a 34.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen Embedded R1600's 3,276 — a 149% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1600.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+300% | 2 / 4 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+42% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+38% | 2.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+700% | 4 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 22,430+585% | 3,276 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded R1600 debuted at $0. On MSRP ($329 vs $0), the Ryzen Embedded R1600 is $329 cheaper.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Embedded R1600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $0-100% |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2 | — |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












