Ryzen 7 3700X vs Ryzen Embedded R1606G

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

8 Cores16 Thrd65 WWMax: 4.4 GHz2019

Popular choices:

VS
AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

2 Cores4 Thrd15 WWMax: 3.5 GHz2019

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - CPU

About PassMark

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

  • Better for gaming: +354.9% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • +700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
  • 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

  • Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded R1606G mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
  • 333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

2019

Why buy it

  • Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
  • Lower PassMark (4,162 vs 22,430).
  • Smaller total L3 cache (4 MB vs 32 MB).

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen Embedded R1606G?
Yes. Ryzen 7 3700X is the better overall CPU here. You are getting a 354.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data, 438.9% better PassMark, and the stronger long-term platform, which makes it the stronger all-around choice.
Which one is better for gaming?
If gaming is the priority, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 354.9% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen 7 3700X is the better fit. You are getting 438.9% better PassMark, backed by 8 cores and 16 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB).
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Ryzen 7 3700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3700X is at an unclear MSRP at $329 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 354.9% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 3700X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting 700% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 4 MB) and more multi-core headroom with 8 cores / 16 threads instead of 2/4. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetRyzen 7 3700XRyzen Embedded R1606G
1080p
low200 FPS104 FPS
medium163 FPS104 FPS
high137 FPS102 FPS
ultra110 FPS83 FPS
1440p
low156 FPS104 FPS
medium121 FPS104 FPS
high100 FPS85 FPS
ultra80 FPS68 FPS
4K
low84 FPS64 FPS
medium71 FPS57 FPS
high56 FPS44 FPS
ultra44 FPS34 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetRyzen 7 3700XRyzen Embedded R1606G
1080p
low561 FPS104 FPS
medium525 FPS92 FPS
high428 FPS85 FPS
ultra383 FPS64 FPS
1440p
low545 FPS86 FPS
medium471 FPS74 FPS
high394 FPS68 FPS
ultra337 FPS54 FPS
4K
low350 FPS60 FPS
medium304 FPS52 FPS
high274 FPS36 FPS
ultra242 FPS24 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetRyzen 7 3700XRyzen Embedded R1606G
1080p
low561 FPS104 FPS
medium561 FPS104 FPS
high561 FPS104 FPS
ultra561 FPS104 FPS
1440p
low561 FPS104 FPS
medium561 FPS104 FPS
high538 FPS104 FPS
ultra470 FPS104 FPS
4K
low499 FPS104 FPS
medium394 FPS104 FPS
high343 FPS104 FPS
ultra275 FPS104 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetRyzen 7 3700XRyzen Embedded R1606G
1080p
low561 FPS104 FPS
medium561 FPS104 FPS
high561 FPS104 FPS
ultra561 FPS104 FPS
1440p
low561 FPS104 FPS
medium561 FPS104 FPS
high561 FPS104 FPS
ultra555 FPS104 FPS
4K
low561 FPS104 FPS
medium501 FPS104 FPS
high447 FPS104 FPS
ultra396 FPS104 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Embedded R1606G

AMD

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

AMD

Ryzen Embedded R1606G

The Ryzen Embedded R1606G is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 25 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 2 cores and 4 threads. Base frequency is 2.6 GHz, with boost up to 3.5 GHz. L3 cache: 4 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 25 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-2400. Passmark benchmark score: 4,162 points. Launch price was $69.

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G offers 2 cores / 4 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 6 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.5 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded R1606G — a 22.8% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen Embedded R1606G's 4,162 — a 137.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 4 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded R1606G.

FeatureRyzen 7 3700XRyzen Embedded R1606G
Cores / Threads
8 / 16+300%
2 / 4
Boost Clock
4.4 GHz+26%
3.5 GHz
Base Clock
3.6 GHz+38%
2.6 GHz
L3 Cache
32 MB+700%
4 MB (total)
L2 Cache
512K (per core)
512 kB (per core)
Process
7 nm, 12 nm-50%
14 nm
Architecture
Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)
Zen (2017−2020)
PassMark
22,430+439%
4,162
🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.

FeatureRyzen 7 3700XRyzen Embedded R1606G
Socket
AM4
FP5
PCIe Generation
PCIe 4.0+33%
PCIe 3.0
Max RAM Speed
DDR4-3200
Max RAM Capacity
128 GB
RAM Channels
2
ECC Support
Yes
PCIe Lanes
24
💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded R1606G debuted at $0. On MSRP ($329 vs $0), the Ryzen Embedded R1606G is $329 cheaper.

FeatureRyzen 7 3700XRyzen Embedded R1606G
MSRP
$329
$0-100%
Performance per Dollar
68.2
Release Date
2019
2019