
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +221.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+1500% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Delivers 52.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 44.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌119.3% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
2018Why buy it
- ✅Costs $179 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,724 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen Embedded V1605B
2018Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +221.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+1500% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 2 MB).
- ✅Delivers 52.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 44.8 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $150 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $179 less on MSRP ($150 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 15W instead of 65W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌119.3% HIGHER MSRP$329 MSRPvs$150 MSRP
- ❌333.3% higher power demand at 65W vs 15W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (6,724 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (2 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 44.8 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($150 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen Embedded V1605B?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 120 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 121 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 68 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 168 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 168 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 168 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 168 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Embedded V1605B


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen Embedded V1605B
Ryzen Embedded V1605B
The Ryzen Embedded V1605B is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 21 February 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017−2020) architecture. It features 4 cores and 8 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.6 GHz. L3 cache: 2 MB (total). L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: FP5. Thermal design power (TDP): 15 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 6,724 points. Launch price was $149.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B offers 4 cores / 8 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.6 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B — a 20% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses Zen (2017−2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen Embedded V1605B's 6,724 — a 107.7% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 2 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V1605B.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+100% | 4 / 8 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+22% | 3.6 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+1500% | 2 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Zen (2017−2020) |
| PassMark | 22,430+234% | 6,724 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B uses FP5 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Embedded V1605B debuted at $150. On MSRP ($329 vs $150), the Ryzen Embedded V1605B is $179 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 44.8 pts/$ for the Ryzen Embedded V1605B — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 41.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Embedded V1605B |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $150-54% |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+52% | 44.8 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












