
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Embedded V3C48
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Ryzen Embedded V3C48
2022Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,203 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen Embedded V3C48
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +30.8% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 16 MB).
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Draws 45W instead of 65W, a 20W reduction.
- ✅Newer platform on FP7 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌44.4% higher power demand at 65W vs 45W.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Embedded V3C48 moves to FP7 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,203 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (16 MB vs 32 MB).
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen Embedded V3C48?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 144 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 35 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 206 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 167 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 134 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 444 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 359 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 412 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 320 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 283 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 227 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 505 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 505 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 461 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 486 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 435 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 339 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Embedded V3C48


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen Embedded V3C48
Ryzen Embedded V3C48
The Ryzen Embedded V3C48 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 27 September 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Rembrandt (2022) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.3 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 16 MB (total). L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 6 nm process technology. Socket: FP7. Thermal design power (TDP): 45 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 20,203 points. Launch price was $299.
Processing Power
Both the Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Embedded V3C48 share an identical 8-core/16-thread configuration. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.8 GHz on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.3 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses Rembrandt (2022) (6 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen Embedded V3C48's 20,203 — a 10.4% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 16 MB (total) on the Ryzen Embedded V3C48.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 8 / 16 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+16% | 3.8 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+9% | 3.3 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+100% | 16 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 6 nm-14% |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Rembrandt (2022) |
| PassMark | 22,430+11% | 20,203 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Embedded V3C48 uses FP7 (PCIe 3.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Embedded V3C48 |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FP7 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0+33% | PCIe 3.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











