
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $470 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- β Delivers 135.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 29.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 23,150).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
2017Why buy it
- β +3.2% higher PassMark.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 29.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
2017Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +7.0% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $470 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- β Delivers 135.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 29.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- β +3.2% higher PassMark.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 23,150).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 29.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen Threadripper 1920X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 111 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 154 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 81 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 38 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 414 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 319 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 404 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 317 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 274 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 260 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 233 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 190 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 556 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 489 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 453 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 271 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 579 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 579 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 527 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 453 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 475 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 436 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 392 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 338 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Threadripper 1920X


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
Ryzen Threadripper 1920X
The Ryzen Threadripper 1920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 10 August 2017 (8 years ago). It is based on the Zen (2017β2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 14 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 23,150 points. Launch price was $799.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X β a 4.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X uses Zen (2017β2020) (14 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X's 23,150 β a 3.2% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X. Both processors carry 32 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+5% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+3% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-50% | 14 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) | Zen (2017β2020) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 23,150+3% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | Yes | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | β |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X debuted at $799. On MSRP ($329 vs $799), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $470 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 29.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 1920X β making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 80.7% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 1920X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-59% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+135% | 29.0 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2017 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











