
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $320 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- β Delivers 75.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 38.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 25,148).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018Why buy it
- β +12.1% higher PassMark.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 38.7 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($649 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
2018Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $320 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- β Delivers 75.9% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 38.7 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 180W, a 115W reduction.
- β 100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- β +12.1% higher PassMark.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 25,148).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 38.7 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($649 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β176.9% higher power demand at 180W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen Threadripper 2920X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 155 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 129 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 84 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 369 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 328 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 429 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 332 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 276 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 248 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 198 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 626 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 566 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 495 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 522 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 458 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 399 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 460 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 274 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 629 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 629 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 626 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 629 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 629 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 563 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 492 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 503 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 463 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 361 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Threadripper 2920X


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
Ryzen Threadripper 2920X
The Ryzen Threadripper 2920X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 3 October 2018 (7 years ago). It is based on the ZEN+ (2018β2019) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 12 nm process technology. Socket: SP3r2. Thermal design power (TDP): 180 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Quad-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 25,148 points. Launch price was $649.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X offers 12 cores / 24 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X β a 2.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses ZEN+ (2018β2019) (12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X's 25,148 β a 11.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X. Both processors carry 32 MB of L3 cache.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+2% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+3% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 32 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-42% | 12 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) | ZEN+ (2018β2019) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 25,148+12% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X uses SP3r2 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | SP3r2 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | β |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | β |
| RAM Channels | 2 | β |
| ECC Support | Yes | β |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | β |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X debuted at $649. On MSRP ($329 vs $649), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $320 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 38.7 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 2920X β making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 55% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 2920X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-49% | $649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+76% | 38.7 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2018 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











