
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $3,661 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
- β Delivers 240.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 79,889).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 256 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
2019Why buy it
- β +256.2% higher PassMark.
- β +700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β 266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 20.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($3,990 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +7.7% higher average FPS across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $3,661 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
- β Delivers 240.5% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 20.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $3,990 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
Why buy it
- β +256.2% higher PassMark.
- β +700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β 266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 79,889).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 256 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 3 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 20.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($3,990 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen Threadripper 3990X?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 181 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 157 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 102 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 83 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 85 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 584 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 503 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 491 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 343 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 204 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 681 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 563 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 497 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 428 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 582 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 488 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 427 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 368 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 424 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 338 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 293 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 234 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 942 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 842 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 724 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 639 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 777 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 677 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 580 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 502 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 540 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 373 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Threadripper 3990X


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
Ryzen Threadripper 3990X
The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 February 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019β2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.9 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: TR4. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 79,889 points. Launch price was $3,999.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X offers 64 cores / 128 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X has 56 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X β a 2.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.9 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses Matisse (2019β2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X's 79,889 β a 112.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 64 / 128+700% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+2% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+24% | 2.9 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 256 MB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) | Matisse (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 79,889+256% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 64,366 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,961 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 22,045 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X uses TR4 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper 3990X supports up to 256 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 66.7% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X) β the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and TRX40 (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | TR4 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 256 GB+100% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 88+267% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / true (Ryzen Threadripper 3990X). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 3990X rivals Core i9-10980XE.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | β | None |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | true |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X debuted at $3990. On MSRP ($329 vs $3990), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $3661 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 20.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 3990X β making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 109.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 3990X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-92% | $3990 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+241% | 20.0 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2019 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











