PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,170 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 10.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 61.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9960X across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 92,808).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 9960X, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper 9960X moves to sTR5 and DDR5.

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.9 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $1,170 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Delivers 10.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 61.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,499 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +14.1% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9960X across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 92,808).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 9960X, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper 9960X moves to sTR5 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 61.9 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,499 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper 9960X better than Ryzen 7 3700X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper 9960X makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 14.1% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 128 MB vs 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is the better fit. You are getting 313.8% better PassMark, backed by 24 cores and 48 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is 355.6% more expensive on MSRP at $1,499 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you a 14.1% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 3700X is also 10.1% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 61.9 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with sTR5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, more multi-core headroom with 24 cores / 48 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
1080p
low	200 FPS	314 FPS
medium	163 FPS	290 FPS
high	137 FPS	241 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	203 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	278 FPS
medium	121 FPS	231 FPS
high	100 FPS	179 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	158 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	191 FPS
medium	71 FPS	158 FPS
high	56 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	107 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
1080p
low	561 FPS	826 FPS
medium	525 FPS	704 FPS
high	428 FPS	548 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	474 FPS
1440p
low	545 FPS	677 FPS
medium	471 FPS	601 FPS
high	394 FPS	482 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	390 FPS
4K
low	350 FPS	378 FPS
medium	304 FPS	341 FPS
high	274 FPS	311 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	272 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
1080p
low	561 FPS	893 FPS
medium	561 FPS	724 FPS
high	561 FPS	650 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	553 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	716 FPS
medium	561 FPS	581 FPS
high	538 FPS	509 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	428 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	509 FPS
medium	394 FPS	420 FPS
high	343 FPS	376 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	312 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
1080p
low	561 FPS	1116 FPS
medium	561 FPS	1002 FPS
high	561 FPS	879 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	792 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	873 FPS
medium	561 FPS	769 FPS
high	561 FPS	675 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	588 FPS
4K
low	561 FPS	637 FPS
medium	501 FPS	568 FPS
high	447 FPS	505 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Ryzen Threadripper 9960X

The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.3 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 92,808 points. Launch price was $1,499.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X offers 24 cores / 48 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X — a 18.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X's 92,808 — a 122.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	24 / 48+200%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	5.3 GHz+20%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz	4.2 GHz+17%
L3 Cache	32 MB	128 MB (total)+300%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Shimada Peak (2025)
PassMark	22,430	92,808+314%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	41,000
Geekbench 6 Single	—	3,200
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	26,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X — the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper 9960X supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 88 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X) — the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Socket	AM4	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	1024 GB+700%
RAM Channels	2	4+100%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	88+267%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / true (Ryzen Threadripper 9960X). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 9960X targets Content Creation / Rendering. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 9960X rivals Xeon w7-3555.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper 9960X
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	true
Target Use	—	Content Creation / Rendering

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X debuted at $1499. On MSRP ($329 vs $1499), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $1170 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 61.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 9960X — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 9.6% better value option.