
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Costs $2,170 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- β Delivers 57.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 43.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9970X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 108,377).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 9970X, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 92 PCIe lanes.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper 9970X moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
2025Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +25.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 92 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- β 283.3% more PCIe lanes (92 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 43.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
2025Why buy it
- β Costs $2,170 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- β Delivers 57.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 43.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +25.0% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 92 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- β 283.3% more PCIe lanes (92 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper 9970X across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 108,377).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper 9970X, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 92 PCIe lanes.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper 9970X moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 43.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper 9970X better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 289 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 178 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 818 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 697 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 542 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 472 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 674 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 388 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 377 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 339 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 271 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 891 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 723 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 649 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 552 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 714 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 580 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 508 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 427 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 508 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 311 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 1116 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 1002 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 879 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 792 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 872 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 768 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 674 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 587 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 636 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 504 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Threadripper 9970X


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
Ryzen Threadripper 9970X
The Ryzen Threadripper 9970X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 30 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 108,377 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X offers 32 cores / 64 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X β a 20.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X's 108,377 β a 131.4% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 32 / 64+300% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 128 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 108,377+383% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 76,136 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 3,220 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 29,244 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X β the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 1 TB β 196.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 4 (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 92 (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X) β the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X offers 68 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1 TB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 92+283% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / AMD-V, SVM (Ryzen Threadripper 9970X). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper 9970X targets HEDT / Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper 9970X rivals Xeon w7-3465X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | Yes |
| Virtualization | β | AMD-V, SVM |
| Target Use | β | HEDT / Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X debuted at $2499. On MSRP ($329 vs $2499), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $2170 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 43.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper 9970X β making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 44.5% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper 9970X |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-87% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+57% | 43.4 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











