
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Costs $820 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- β Delivers 134.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 29.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 33,455).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β 433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 29.1 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
2020Why buy it
- β Costs $820 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- β Delivers 134.1% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 29.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,149 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +3.7% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β 433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 33,455).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 29.1 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,149 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 145 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 88 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 86 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 57 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 46 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 557 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 395 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 351 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 478 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 296 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 217 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 772 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 637 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 568 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 494 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 599 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 436 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 376 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 243 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 836 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 836 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 823 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 725 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 836 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 745 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 630 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 540 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 594 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 540 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 468 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 405 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Castle Peak (2020) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512 kB (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 33,455 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.3 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX β a 2.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses Castle Peak (2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX's 33,455 β a 39.5% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+2% | 4.3 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512 kB (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) | Castle Peak (2020) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 33,455+49% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 18,500 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,652 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 11,500 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX) β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX targets Professional Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX rivals Xeon w5-2455X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | AMD-V |
| Target Use | β | Professional Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX debuted at $1149. On MSRP ($329 vs $1149), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $820 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 29.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX β making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 80.3% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3945WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-71% | $1149 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+134% | 29.1 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











