
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +12.2% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $5,160 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
- β Delivers 349.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 83,235).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 256 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020Why buy it
- β +271.1% higher PassMark.
- β +700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β 433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($5,489 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
2020Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +12.2% higher average FPS across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Costs $5,160 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
- β Delivers 349.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 15.2 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $5,489 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
Why buy it
- β +271.1% higher PassMark.
- β +700% larger total L3 cache (256 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β 433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 83,235).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 256 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 5 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 15.2 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($5,489 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 173 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 71 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 61 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 40 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 571 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 325 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 480 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 423 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 272 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 201 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 546 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 481 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 412 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 555 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 465 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 354 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 406 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 323 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 227 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 909 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 818 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 695 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 604 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 739 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 643 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 545 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 463 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 514 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 461 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 407 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 346 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 14 July 2020 (5 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (2019β2020) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 4.2 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 83,235 points. Launch price was $5,500.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX offers 64 cores / 128 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX has 56 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.2 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX β a 4.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses Matisse (2019β2020) (7 nm, 12 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX's 83,235 β a 115.1% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 256 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 64 / 128+700% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+5% | 4.2 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+33% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 256 MB+700% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm, 12 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) | Matisse (2019β2020) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 83,235+271% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 64,355 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,266 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 20,256 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX) β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-3200 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX rivals Xeon Platinum 8280.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | β | None |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | No |
| Virtualization | β | true |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX debuted at $5489. On MSRP ($329 vs $5489), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $5160 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 15.2 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX β making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 127.2% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-94% | $5489 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+349% | 15.2 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2020 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











