
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Costs $470 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- β Delivers 11.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 61.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 48,756).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
2022Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +19.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β 433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 61.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
2022Why buy it
- β Costs $470 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- β Delivers 11.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 61.0 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 280W, a 215W reduction.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +19.8% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β +100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β 433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 48,756).
- βSmaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 61.0 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($799 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β330.8% higher power demand at 280W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 175 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 152 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 62 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 50 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 770 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 656 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 516 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 453 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 639 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 554 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 457 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 375 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 262 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 806 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 662 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 605 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 526 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 618 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 507 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 459 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 395 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 357 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 258 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 1200 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 1015 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 911 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 806 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 933 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 817 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 703 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 601 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 667 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 599 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 521 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 8 March 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Chagall PRO (2022) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 4.5 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm process technology. Socket: sWRX8. Thermal design power (TDP): 280 Watt. Memory support: DDR4-3200. Passmark benchmark score: 48,756 points. Launch price was $499.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 16 cores / 32 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.5 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX β a 2.2% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses Chagall PRO (2022) (7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX's 48,756 β a 74% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 64 MB on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 16 / 32+100% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 4.5 GHz+2% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4 GHz+11% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 64 MB+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 512K (per core) |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) | Chagall PRO (2022) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 48,756+117% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX uses sWRX8 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX supports 199.5% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB β 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX) β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and WRX80 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sWRX8 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 3200+79900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+6553500% | 2048 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX rivals Xeon w5-3335.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | β | None |
| Unlocked | β | Yes |
| AVX-512 | β | Yes |
| Virtualization | β | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX debuted at $799. On MSRP ($329 vs $799), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $470 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 61.0 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX β making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 11.1% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 5955WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-59% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+12% | 61.0 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2022 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











