
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Costs $7,020 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $7,349 MSRP).
- β Delivers 276.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $7,349 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 133,149).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
2023Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +11.6% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- β 433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 18.1 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($7,349 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
2023Why buy it
- β Costs $7,020 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $7,349 MSRP).
- β Delivers 276.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 18.1 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $7,349 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +11.6% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 64 cores / 128 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- β 433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 133,149).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX, which brings 64 cores / 128 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 18.1 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($7,349 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 195 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 268 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 223 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 171 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 104 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 787 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 672 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 529 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 462 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 577 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 380 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 363 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 327 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 265 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 889 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 728 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 654 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 556 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 693 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 567 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 498 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 490 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 407 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 365 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 303 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 1131 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 1014 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 889 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 802 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 890 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 783 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 688 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 599 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 579 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 514 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 19 October 2023 (2 years ago). It is based on the Storm Peak (2023) architecture. It features 64 cores and 128 threads. Base frequency is 3.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.1 GHz. L3 cache: 256 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 5 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 133,149 points. Launch price was $7,349.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX offers 64 cores / 128 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX has 56 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5.1 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX β a 14.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX uses Storm Peak (2023) (5 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX's 133,149 β a 142.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 256 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 64 / 128+700% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.1 GHz+16% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+12% | 3.2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 256 MB (total)+700% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 5 nm-29% |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) | Storm Peak (2023) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 133,149+494% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 100,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 2,599 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 24,780 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-5200 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX) β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-5200+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX rivals Xeon w9-3475X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | β | Yes |
| Virtualization | β | true |
| Target Use | β | High-end Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX debuted at $7349. On MSRP ($329 vs $7349), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $7020 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 18.1 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX β making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 116% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 7985WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-96% | $7349 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+277% | 18.1 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2023 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











