
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,011 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,340 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,340 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 56,854).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,340 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,011 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $1,340 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 60.7% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 42.4 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $1,340 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +9.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+100% larger total L3 cache (64 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 56,854).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 64 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 42.4 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($1,340 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 253 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 188 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 169 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 152 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 98 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 791 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 650 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 409 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 651 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 555 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 428 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 366 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 315 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 277 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 233 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 886 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 704 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 622 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 534 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 566 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 488 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 414 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 507 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 418 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 375 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 315 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 1106 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 991 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 867 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 781 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 860 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 759 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 664 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 576 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 632 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 562 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 496 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 429 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 2025-01-01. It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 4.7 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 64 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 56,854 points. Launch price was $2,000.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX's 56,854 — a 86.8% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 64 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 12 / 24+50% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4.7 GHz+31% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 64 MB (total)+100% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 56,854+153% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX supports up to 2048 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | 6400+159900% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB+6553500% | 2048 |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX). Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX rivals Xeon w7-3545.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | Yes |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d, AMD-V |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX debuted at $1340. On MSRP ($329 vs $1340), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $1011 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 42.4 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 46.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9945WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-75% | $1340 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+61% | 42.4 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











