
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Costs $2,570 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,899 MSRP).
- β Delivers 111.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 32.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,899 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 93,660).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
2025Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +19.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- β 433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 32.3 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($2,899 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
2025Why buy it
- β Costs $2,570 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $2,899 MSRP).
- β Delivers 111.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 32.3 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $2,899 MSRP).
- β Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.
Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +19.9% higher average FPS across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 24 cores / 48 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- β 433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX across 2 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 93,660).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX, which brings 24 cores / 48 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
- βOlder platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark per dollar, at 32.3 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($2,899 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- β438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX better than Ryzen 7 3700X?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 290 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 241 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 203 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 231 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 191 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 107 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 826 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 704 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 548 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 474 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 677 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 601 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 482 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 390 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 378 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 341 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 272 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 893 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 724 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 650 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 553 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 716 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 581 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 509 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 428 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 509 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 420 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 376 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 312 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 1116 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 1002 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 879 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 792 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 873 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 769 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 675 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 588 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 637 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 568 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 437 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.


Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX
The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 24 cores and 48 threads. Base frequency is 4.2 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 93,660 points. Launch price was $2,899.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX offers 24 cores / 48 threads β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX has 16 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX β a 20.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX's 93,660 β a 122.7% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 24 / 48+200% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 4.2 GHz+17% |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 128 MB (total)+300% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1 MB (per core)+100% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | 4 nm-43% |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) | Shimada Peak (2025) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 93,660+318% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 60,336 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 3,349 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 30,722 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX) β the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | sTR5 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 2048 GB+1500% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 8+300% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 128+433% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX rivals Xeon w9-3595X.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| AVX-512 | β | Yes |
| Virtualization | β | true |
| Target Use | β | High-end Workstation |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX debuted at $2899. On MSRP ($329 vs $2899), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $2570 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 32.3 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX β making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 71.4% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9965WX |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-89% | $2899 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+111% | 32.3 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











