PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,770 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $4,099 MSRP).
✅Delivers 163.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 25.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $4,099 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 106,263).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.9% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.9 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($4,099 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,770 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $4,099 MSRP).
✅Delivers 163.0% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 25.9 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $4,099 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 350W, a 285W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +13.9% higher average FPS across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 32 cores / 64 threads, plus 128 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on sTR5 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅433.3% more PCIe lanes (128 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX across 49 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 106,263).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX, which brings 32 cores / 64 threads and 128 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX moves to sTR5 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 25.9 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($4,099 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌438.5% higher power demand at 350W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX better than Ryzen 7 3700X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 13.9% more average FPS across 49 shared CPU game tests. It also has a big cache advantage at 128 MB vs 32 MB.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is the better fit. You are getting 373.8% better PassMark, backed by 32 cores and 64 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 300% larger total L3 cache (128 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is 1145.9% more expensive on MSRP at $4,099 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you a 13.9% average FPS lead across 49 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 3700X is also 163.0% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 25.9 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with sTR5 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 3D V-Cache and a much larger 128 MB L3 cache instead of 32 MB, more multi-core headroom with 32 cores / 64 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
1080p
low	200 FPS	314 FPS
medium	163 FPS	289 FPS
high	137 FPS	240 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	203 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	278 FPS
medium	121 FPS	231 FPS
high	100 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	158 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	191 FPS
medium	71 FPS	158 FPS
high	56 FPS	121 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	107 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
1080p
low	561 FPS	818 FPS
medium	525 FPS	697 FPS
high	428 FPS	542 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	472 FPS
1440p
low	545 FPS	674 FPS
medium	471 FPS	599 FPS
high	394 FPS	480 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	388 FPS
4K
low	350 FPS	377 FPS
medium	304 FPS	339 FPS
high	274 FPS	310 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	271 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
1080p
low	561 FPS	891 FPS
medium	561 FPS	723 FPS
high	561 FPS	649 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	552 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	714 FPS
medium	561 FPS	580 FPS
high	538 FPS	508 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	427 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	508 FPS
medium	394 FPS	419 FPS
high	343 FPS	375 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	311 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
1080p
low	561 FPS	1116 FPS
medium	561 FPS	1002 FPS
high	561 FPS	879 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	792 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	872 FPS
medium	561 FPS	768 FPS
high	561 FPS	674 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	587 FPS
4K
low	561 FPS	636 FPS
medium	501 FPS	568 FPS
high	447 FPS	504 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX

The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 23 July 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Shimada Peak (2025) architecture. It features 32 cores and 64 threads. Base frequency is 4 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 128 MB (total). L2 cache: 1 MB (per core). Built on 4 nm process technology. Socket: sTR5. Thermal design power (TDP): 350 Watt. Memory support: DDR5. Passmark benchmark score: 106,263 points. Launch price was $4,099.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX offers 32 cores / 64 threads — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX has 24 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5.4 GHz on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX (base: 3.6 GHz vs 4 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX uses Shimada Peak (2025) (4 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX's 106,263 — a 130.3% lead for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 128 MB (total) on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	32 / 64+300%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz	5.4 GHz+23%
Base Clock	3.6 GHz	4 GHz+11%
L3 Cache	32 MB	128 MB (total)+300%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1 MB (per core)+100%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	4 nm-43%
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Shimada Peak (2025)
PassMark	22,430	106,263+374%
Cinebench R23 Multi	—	83,982
Geekbench 6 Single	—	3,200
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	31,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX uses sTR5 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-6400 on the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX supports up to 2048 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 176.5% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 128 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX) — the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX offers 104 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and WRX90,TRX50 (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
Socket	AM4	sTR5
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	2048 GB+1500%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	128+433%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / true (Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX). Primary use case: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX targets High-end Workstation. Direct competitor: Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX rivals Xeon w7-3465X.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX
Integrated GPU	No	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	true
Target Use	—	High-end Workstation

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX debuted at $4099. On MSRP ($329 vs $4099), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $3770 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 25.9 pts/$ for the Ryzen Threadripper PRO 9975WX — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 89.8% better value option.