
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon 6337P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 348.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6337P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Xeon 6337P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $269 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 411.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 348.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,917 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon 6337P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +12.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 80W, a 15W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $269 less on MSRP ($60 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 411.3% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 348.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($60 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 68.2 vs 348.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $60 MSRP).
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6337P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark (20,917 vs 22,430).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌23.1% higher power demand at 80W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon 6337P?
Which one is better for gaming?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6337P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 274 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 239 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 95 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6337P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 408 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 493 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 430 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 366 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 280 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 261 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 223 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6337P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 523 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 523 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 523 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 478 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 511 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 454 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 393 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 328 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6337P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 523 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 523 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 523 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 523 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 516 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 523 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 434 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 366 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon 6337P


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon 6337P
Xeon 6337P
The Xeon 6337P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.5 GHz, with boost up to 5 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 80 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 20,917 points. Launch price was $375.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6337P offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5 GHz on the Xeon 6337P — a 12.8% clock advantage for the Xeon 6337P (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.5 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6337P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon 6337P's 20,917 — a 7% lead for the Ryzen 7 3700X. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon 6337P.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6337P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5 GHz+14% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+3% | 3.5 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+78% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 22,430+7% | 20,917 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6337P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6337P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon 6337P debuted at $60. On MSRP ($329 vs $60), the Xeon 6337P is $269 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 348.6 pts/$ for the Xeon 6337P — making the Xeon 6337P the 134.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6337P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329 | $60-82% |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2 | 348.6+411% |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2025 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











