
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon 6349P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 25,953).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon 6349P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6349P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Xeon 6349P
2025Why buy it
- ✅+15.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon 6349P
2025Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +8.5% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅+77.8% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 18 MB).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 95W, a 30W reduction.
- ✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Why buy it
- ✅+15.7% higher PassMark.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA1700 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 25,953).
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon 6349P mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6349P moves to LGA1700 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (18 MB vs 32 MB).
- ❌46.2% higher power demand at 95W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon 6349P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 260 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 218 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 242 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 202 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 109 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 96 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 510 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 425 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 451 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 380 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 331 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 292 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 268 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 227 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 649 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 583 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 560 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 484 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 517 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 462 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 337 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 649 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 649 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 649 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 649 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 639 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 557 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 495 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 435 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon 6349P


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon 6349P
Xeon 6349P
The Xeon 6349P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) architecture. It features 6 cores and 12 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 5.4 GHz. L3 cache: 18 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on Intel 7 nm process technology. Socket: LGA1700. Thermal design power (TDP): 95 Watt. Memory support: DDR5-4800. Passmark benchmark score: 25,953 points. Launch price was $509.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6349P offers 6 cores / 12 threads — the Ryzen 7 3700X has 2 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 5.4 GHz on the Xeon 6349P — a 20.4% clock advantage for the Xeon 6349P (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6349P uses Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) (Intel 7 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon 6349P's 25,953 — a 14.6% lead for the Xeon 6349P. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 18 MB (total) on the Xeon 6349P.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16+33% | 6 / 12 |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz | 5.4 GHz+23% |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz | 3.6 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+78% | 18 MB (total) |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 1.25 MB (per core)+150% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 7 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Raptor Lake-R (2023−2025) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 25,953+16% |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6349P uses LGA1700 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6349P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA1700 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | — |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | — |
| RAM Channels | 2 | — |
| ECC Support | Yes | — |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | — |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











