PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.1% higher average FPS across 33 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $234 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $563 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 39,341).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 48 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6505P, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6505P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6505P

2025

Why buy it

✅+75.4% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 33 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌
71.1% HIGHER MSRP
$563 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Xeon 6505P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +19.1% higher average FPS across 33 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $234 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $563 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 150W, a 85W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+75.4% higher PassMark.
✅+50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 12 cores / 24 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 39,341).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 48 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6505P, which brings 12 cores / 24 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6505P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 33 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌
71.1% HIGHER MSRP
$563 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
❌130.8% higher power demand at 150W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6505P better than Ryzen 7 3700X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6505P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6505P is the better fit. You are getting 75.4% better PassMark, backed by 12 cores and 24 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6505P is the smarter buy today. Xeon 6505P is 71.1% more expensive on MSRP at $563 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you 75.4% better PassMark. The trade-off is that Ryzen 7 3700X is still the better pure gaming CPU with a 19.1% average FPS lead across 33 shared CPU game tests in our data. It is also 2.5% better value on MSRP (69.9 vs 68.2 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6505P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 50% larger total L3 cache (48 MB vs 32 MB), more multi-core headroom with 12 cores / 24 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Xeon 6505P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6505P
1080p
low	200 FPS	183 FPS
medium	163 FPS	147 FPS
high	137 FPS	119 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	95 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	153 FPS
medium	121 FPS	120 FPS
high	100 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	75 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	70 FPS
medium	71 FPS	59 FPS
high	56 FPS	46 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	38 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon 6505P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6505P
1080p
low	561 FPS	292 FPS
medium	525 FPS	261 FPS
high	428 FPS	216 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	192 FPS
1440p
low	545 FPS	252 FPS
medium	471 FPS	227 FPS
high	394 FPS	194 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	161 FPS
4K
low	350 FPS	158 FPS
medium	304 FPS	144 FPS
high	274 FPS	134 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	120 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon 6505P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6505P
1080p
low	561 FPS	984 FPS
medium	561 FPS	947 FPS
high	561 FPS	875 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	792 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	810 FPS
medium	561 FPS	719 FPS
high	538 FPS	663 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	595 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	511 FPS
medium	394 FPS	421 FPS
high	343 FPS	371 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	304 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon 6505P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6505P
1080p
low	561 FPS	927 FPS
medium	561 FPS	838 FPS
high	561 FPS	722 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	626 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	718 FPS
medium	561 FPS	632 FPS
high	561 FPS	541 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	469 FPS
4K
low	561 FPS	523 FPS
medium	501 FPS	467 FPS
high	447 FPS	410 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	353 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon 6505P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon 6505P

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon 6505P

The Xeon 6505P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 12 cores and 24 threads. Base frequency is 2.2 GHz, with boost up to 4.1 GHz. L3 cache: 48 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 150 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 39,341 points. Launch price was $563.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6505P offers 12 cores / 24 threads — the Xeon 6505P has 4 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.1 GHz on the Xeon 6505P — a 7.1% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6505P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon 6505P's 39,341 — a 54.8% lead for the Xeon 6505P. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 48 MB (total) on the Xeon 6505P.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6505P
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	12 / 24+50%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+7%	4.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+64%	2.2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB	48 MB (total)+50%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	22,430	39,341+75%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6505P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 5.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 6400 on the Xeon 6505P — the Xeon 6505P supports 199.8% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6505P supports up to 4096 of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon 6505P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 88 (Xeon 6505P) — the Xeon 6505P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and LGA4710 (Xeon 6505P).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6505P
Socket	AM4	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 5.0+25%
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	6400+159900%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB+3276700%	4096
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	88+267%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6505P). Direct competitor: Xeon 6505P rivals EPYC 9334.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6505P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon 6505P debuted at $563. On MSRP ($329 vs $563), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $234 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 69.9 pts/$ for the Xeon 6505P — making the Xeon 6505P the 2.5% better value option.