PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,293 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
✅Delivers 548.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 210W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6724P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 38,061).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 72 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6724P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6724P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6724P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +30.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+125% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($3,622 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌223.1% higher power demand at 210W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Xeon 6724P

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $3,293 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
✅Delivers 548.8% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 10.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $3,622 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 210W, a 145W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +30.5% higher average FPS across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+125% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Xeon 6724P across 4 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 38,061).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 72 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6724P, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6724P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 10.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($3,622 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌223.1% higher power demand at 210W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Xeon 6724P better than Ryzen 7 3700X?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6724P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for gaming?

If gaming is the priority, Xeon 6724P is the better pick here. According to our tests, it delivers 30.5% more average FPS across 4 shared CPU game tests.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6724P is the better fit. You are getting 69.7% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 125% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Xeon 6724P is still the faster CPU overall, but Ryzen 7 3700X makes more sense if price matters more than absolute performance. Xeon 6724P is 1000.9% more expensive on MSRP at $3,622 MSRP versus $329 MSRP, and it gives you a 30.5% average FPS lead across 4 shared CPU game tests in our data. Ryzen 7 3700X is also 548.8% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 10.5 PassMark/$), which is why it is easier to justify for price-conscious builds on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6724P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 125% larger total L3 cache (72 MB vs 32 MB), more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/16, and AVX-512 support for heavier modern compute workloads. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Xeon 6724P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6724P
1080p
low	200 FPS	198 FPS
medium	163 FPS	155 FPS
high	137 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	100 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	164 FPS
medium	121 FPS	125 FPS
high	100 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	81 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	85 FPS
medium	71 FPS	70 FPS
high	56 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	45 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon 6724P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6724P
1080p
low	561 FPS	567 FPS
medium	525 FPS	490 FPS
high	428 FPS	397 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	353 FPS
1440p
low	545 FPS	487 FPS
medium	471 FPS	428 FPS
high	394 FPS	359 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	299 FPS
4K
low	350 FPS	305 FPS
medium	304 FPS	271 FPS
high	274 FPS	245 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	220 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon 6724P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6724P
1080p
low	561 FPS	952 FPS
medium	561 FPS	952 FPS
high	561 FPS	921 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	834 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	866 FPS
medium	561 FPS	761 FPS
high	538 FPS	703 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	632 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	546 FPS
medium	394 FPS	445 FPS
high	343 FPS	392 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	322 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon 6724P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6724P
1080p
low	561 FPS	952 FPS
medium	561 FPS	952 FPS
high	561 FPS	952 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	821 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	952 FPS
medium	561 FPS	868 FPS
high	561 FPS	732 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	626 FPS
4K
low	561 FPS	717 FPS
medium	501 FPS	631 FPS
high	447 FPS	543 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	437 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon 6724P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon 6724P

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon 6724P

The Xeon 6724P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.3 GHz. L3 cache: 72 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 210 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 38,061 points. Launch price was $3,622.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6724P offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon 6724P has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 4.3 GHz on the Xeon 6724P — a 2.3% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 3.6 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6724P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon 6724P's 38,061 — a 51.7% lead for the Xeon 6724P. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 72 MB (total) on the Xeon 6724P.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6724P
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+2%	4.3 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz	3.6 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB	72 MB (total)+125%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	22,430	38,061+70%
Geekbench 6 Single	—	1,800
Geekbench 6 Multi	—	25,000

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6724P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6724P — the Xeon 6724P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6724P supports up to 4096 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon 6724P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 88 (Xeon 6724P) — the Xeon 6724P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and C741 (Xeon 6724P).

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6724P
Socket	AM4	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4096 GB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	88+267%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6724P). Primary use case: Xeon 6724P targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6724P rivals EPYC 9554.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6724P
Integrated GPU	No	No
IGPU Model	—	None
Unlocked	—	No
AVX-512	—	Yes
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d
Target Use	—	Server

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon 6724P debuted at $3622. On MSRP ($329 vs $3622), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $3293 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 10.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6724P — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 146.6% better value option.