PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.5% higher average FPS across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,321 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
✅Delivers 249.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 90,684).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 288 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6740P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6740P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Xeon 6740P

2025

Why buy it

✅+304.3% higher PassMark.
✅+800% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($4,650 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Xeon 6740P

2025

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +21.5% higher average FPS across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅Costs $4,321 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
✅Delivers 249.6% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 19.5 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $4,650 MSRP).
✅Draws 65W instead of 270W, a 205W reduction.

Why buy it

✅+304.3% higher PassMark.
✅+800% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 32 MB).
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 48 cores / 96 threads, plus 88 PCIe lanes vs 24.
✅Newer platform on LGA4710 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
✅266.7% more PCIe lanes (88 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 90,684).
❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 288 MB).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6740P, which brings 48 cores / 96 threads and 88 PCIe lanes.
❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6740P moves to LGA4710 and DDR5.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 15 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 19.5 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($4,650 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
❌315.4% higher power demand at 270W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon 6740P?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon 6740P makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon 6740P is the better fit. You are getting 304.3% better PassMark, backed by 48 cores and 96 threads. It also carries the larger cache pool with 800% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 32 MB).

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3700X is $4,321 cheaper on MSRP at $329 MSRP versus $4,650 MSRP, and it gives you a 21.5% average FPS lead across 15 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon 6740P is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 304.3% better PassMark. It is also 249.6% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 19.5 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon 6740P is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2025 vs 2019), a healthier platform with LGA4710 and DDR5 instead of AM4, 800% larger total L3 cache (288 MB vs 32 MB), and more multi-core headroom with 48 cores / 96 threads instead of 8/16. That should give you a better long-term upgrade path for motherboard, RAM, and future CPU swaps.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Xeon 6740P Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6740P
1080p
low	200 FPS	187 FPS
medium	163 FPS	165 FPS
high	137 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	106 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	155 FPS
medium	121 FPS	131 FPS
high	100 FPS	100 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	82 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	70 FPS
medium	71 FPS	63 FPS
high	56 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	40 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon 6740P

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6740P
1080p
low	561 FPS	285 FPS
medium	525 FPS	252 FPS
high	428 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	171 FPS
1440p
low	545 FPS	233 FPS
medium	471 FPS	210 FPS
high	394 FPS	178 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	142 FPS
4K
low	350 FPS	144 FPS
medium	304 FPS	133 FPS
high	274 FPS	120 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	100 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon 6740P

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6740P
1080p
low	561 FPS	849 FPS
medium	561 FPS	768 FPS
high	561 FPS	730 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	641 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	737 FPS
medium	561 FPS	662 FPS
high	538 FPS	626 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	558 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	493 FPS
medium	394 FPS	402 FPS
high	343 FPS	364 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	303 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon 6740P

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6740P
1080p
low	561 FPS	1097 FPS
medium	561 FPS	978 FPS
high	561 FPS	834 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	702 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	902 FPS
medium	561 FPS	777 FPS
high	561 FPS	660 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	551 FPS
4K
low	561 FPS	656 FPS
medium	501 FPS	577 FPS
high	447 FPS	505 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	425 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon 6740P

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon 6740P

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon 6740P

The Xeon 6740P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2025 (less than a year ago). It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 48 cores and 96 threads. Base frequency is 2.1 GHz, with boost up to 3.8 GHz. L3 cache: 288 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA4710. Thermal design power (TDP): 270 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 90,684 points. Launch price was $4,650.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6740P offers 48 cores / 96 threads — the Xeon 6740P has 40 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.8 GHz on the Xeon 6740P — a 14.6% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.1 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6740P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon 6740P's 90,684 — a 120.7% lead for the Xeon 6740P. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 288 MB (total) on the Xeon 6740P.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6740P
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	48 / 96+500%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+16%	3.8 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+71%	2.1 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB	288 MB (total)+800%
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	2 MB (per core)+300%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm	Intel 3 nm-57%
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Granite Rapids (2024−2025)
PassMark	22,430	90,684+304%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6740P uses LGA4710 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6740P — the Xeon 6740P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Ryzen 7 3700X supports up to 128 GB of RAM compared to 4 TB — 187.9% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 8 (Xeon 6740P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 88 (Xeon 6740P) — the Xeon 6740P offers 64 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6740P
Socket	AM4	LGA4710
PCIe Generation	PCIe 4.0	PCIe 4.0
Max RAM Speed	DDR4-3200	DDR5-6400+25%
Max RAM Capacity	128 GB	4 TB+3100%
RAM Channels	2	8+300%
ECC Support	Yes	Yes
PCIe Lanes	24	88+267%

🔧

Advanced Features

Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT (Xeon 6740P). Primary use case: Xeon 6740P targets High-density Compute. Direct competitor: Xeon 6740P rivals EPYC 9355P.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon 6740P
Integrated GPU	No	No
Virtualization	—	VT-x, VT-d, VT-x EPT
Target Use	—	High-density Compute

💰

Value Analysis

The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon 6740P debuted at $4650. On MSRP ($329 vs $4650), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $4321 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 19.5 pts/$ for the Xeon 6740P — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 111% better value option.