
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon 6960P
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $9,296 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $9,625 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 402.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $9,625 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 500W, a 435W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 130,659).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 432 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6960P, which brings 72 cores / 144 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6960P moves to LGA7529 and DDR5.
Xeon 6960P
2024Why buy it
- ✅+482.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+1250% larger total L3 cache (432 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 144 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA7529 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($9,625 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌669.2% higher power demand at 500W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon 6960P
2024Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +10.4% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Costs $9,296 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $9,625 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 402.2% more PassMark for each dollar spent, at 68.2 vs 13.6 PassMark/$ ($329 MSRP vs $9,625 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 500W, a 435W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+482.5% higher PassMark.
- ✅+1250% larger total L3 cache (432 MB vs 32 MB).
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 72 cores / 144 threads, plus 96 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅Newer platform on LGA7529 with DDR5 support instead of AM4 and DDR4.
- ✅300% more PCIe lanes (96 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 130,659).
- ❌Smaller total L3 cache (32 MB vs 432 MB).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon 6960P, which brings 72 cores / 144 threads and 96 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Older platform position on AM4 with DDR4, while Xeon 6960P moves to LGA7529 and DDR5.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌Lower PassMark per dollar, at 13.6 vs 68.2 PassMark/$ ($9,625 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
- ❌669.2% higher power demand at 500W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon 6960P?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 39 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 450 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 293 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 380 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 247 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 266 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 174 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 985 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 874 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 826 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 734 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 788 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 689 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 651 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 579 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 505 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 397 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 353 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 288 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 985 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 891 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 768 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 658 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 764 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 667 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 571 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 486 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 549 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 489 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 369 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon 6960P


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon 6960P
Xeon 6960P
The Xeon 6960P is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2024-09-24. It is based on the Granite Rapids (2024−2025) architecture. It features 72 cores and 144 threads. Base frequency is 2.7 GHz, with boost up to 3.9 GHz. L3 cache: 432 MB (total). L2 cache: 2 MB (per core). Built on Intel 3 nm process technology. Socket: LGA7529. Thermal design power (TDP): 500 Watt. Memory support: DDR5(6400MT/s), MRDIMM(8800MT/s). Passmark benchmark score: 130,659 points. Launch price was $9,625.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon 6960P offers 72 cores / 144 threads — the Xeon 6960P has 64 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.9 GHz on the Xeon 6960P — a 12% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2.7 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon 6960P uses Granite Rapids (2024−2025) (Intel 3 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon 6960P's 130,659 — a 141.4% lead for the Xeon 6960P. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 432 MB (total) on the Xeon 6960P.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 72 / 144+800% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+13% | 3.9 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+33% | 2.7 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB | 432 MB (total)+1250% |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | 2 MB (per core)+300% |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm | Intel 3 nm-57% |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | Granite Rapids (2024−2025) |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 130,659+483% |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 2,100 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 60,000 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon 6960P uses LGA7529 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR5-6400 on the Xeon 6960P — the Xeon 6960P supports 22.2% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon 6960P supports up to 3072 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 184% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 12 (Xeon 6960P). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 96 (Xeon 6960P) — the Xeon 6960P offers 72 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and Intel 600 Series (Xeon 6960P).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | LGA7529 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR5-6400+25% |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 3072 GB+2300% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 12+500% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 96+300% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon 6960P). Primary use case: Xeon 6960P targets Server. Direct competitor: Xeon 6960P rivals EPYC 9654.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| IGPU Model | — | None |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Server |
Value Analysis
The Ryzen 7 3700X launched at $329 MSRP, while the Xeon 6960P debuted at $9625. On MSRP ($329 vs $9625), the Ryzen 7 3700X is $9296 cheaper. In terms of value on MSRP (PassMark points per dollar), the Ryzen 7 3700X delivers 68.2 pts/$ vs 13.6 pts/$ for the Xeon 6960P — making the Ryzen 7 3700X the 133.6% better value option.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon 6960P |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $329-97% | $9625 |
| Performance per Dollar | 68.2+401% | 13.6 |
| Release Date | 2019 | 2024 |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











