Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon D-2775TE

PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +39.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 27,299).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2775TE, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon D-2775TE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Xeon D-2775TE

2022

Why buy it

✅+21.7% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
❌53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.

Ryzen 7 3700X

2019

Xeon D-2775TE

2022

Why buy it

✅Better for gaming: +39.7% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
✅+28% larger total L3 cache (32 MB vs 25 MB).
✅Draws 65W instead of 100W, a 35W reduction.
✅100+% more PCIe lanes (24 vs 0) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.

Why buy it

✅+21.7% higher PassMark.
✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 16 cores / 32 threads.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 27,299).
❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2775TE, which brings 16 cores / 32 threads.
❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon D-2775TE mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.

Trade-offs

❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
❌Smaller total L3 cache (25 MB vs 32 MB).
❌53.8% higher power demand at 100W vs 65W.

Quick Answers

So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon D-2775TE?

Not in a simple one-size-fits-all way. Xeon D-2775TE makes more sense for workstation-style multi-core throughput, while Ryzen 7 3700X is the better mainstream desktop choice for gaming, platform cost, and day-to-day practicality.

Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?

For streaming, content creation, and heavier multitasking, Xeon D-2775TE is the better fit. You are getting 21.7% better PassMark, backed by 16 cores and 32 threads.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?

Ryzen 7 3700X is the smarter buy today. Ryzen 7 3700X is at an unclear MSRP at $329 MSRP versus unclear MSRP, and it gives you a 39.7% average FPS lead across 50 shared CPU game tests in our data. The trade-off is that Xeon D-2775TE is still stronger for heavier multi-core work with 21.7% better PassMark. It is also 100.0% better value on MSRP (68.2 vs 0.0 PassMark/$), so the better CPU is not just faster, it is also the cleaner value play on paper.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Xeon D-2775TE is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer CPU generation (2022 vs 2019) and more multi-core headroom with 16 cores / 32 threads instead of 8/16. That extra compute headroom should age better as games, background tasks, and creator workloads get heavier.

Games Benchmarks

Paired with RTX 4090

To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.

Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Ryzen 7 3700X Benchmark Check

Xeon D-2775TE Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon D-2775TE
1080p
low	200 FPS	177 FPS
medium	163 FPS	146 FPS
high	137 FPS	117 FPS
ultra	110 FPS	93 FPS
1440p
low	156 FPS	144 FPS
medium	121 FPS	115 FPS
high	100 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	80 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	84 FPS	68 FPS
medium	71 FPS	58 FPS
high	56 FPS	45 FPS
ultra	44 FPS	36 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon D-2775TE

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon D-2775TE
1080p
low	561 FPS	205 FPS
medium	525 FPS	182 FPS
high	428 FPS	155 FPS
ultra	383 FPS	127 FPS
1440p
low	545 FPS	176 FPS
medium	471 FPS	161 FPS
high	394 FPS	140 FPS
ultra	337 FPS	113 FPS
4K
low	350 FPS	114 FPS
medium	304 FPS	106 FPS
high	274 FPS	94 FPS
ultra	242 FPS	75 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon D-2775TE

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon D-2775TE
1080p
low	561 FPS	682 FPS
medium	561 FPS	581 FPS
high	561 FPS	504 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	441 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	587 FPS
medium	561 FPS	478 FPS
high	538 FPS	415 FPS
ultra	470 FPS	362 FPS
4K
low	499 FPS	429 FPS
medium	394 FPS	333 FPS
high	343 FPS	285 FPS
ultra	275 FPS	229 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon D-2775TE

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon D-2775TE
1080p
low	561 FPS	682 FPS
medium	561 FPS	682 FPS
high	561 FPS	642 FPS
ultra	561 FPS	548 FPS
1440p
low	561 FPS	659 FPS
medium	561 FPS	573 FPS
high	561 FPS	492 FPS
ultra	555 FPS	419 FPS
4K
low	561 FPS	450 FPS
medium	501 FPS	403 FPS
high	447 FPS	358 FPS
ultra	396 FPS	309 FPS

Open Ryzen 7 3700X Open Xeon D-2775TE

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon D-2775TE

Ryzen 7 3700X

The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon D-2775TE

The Xeon D-2775TE is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 24 February 2022 (3 years ago). It is based on the Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) architecture. It features 16 cores and 32 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 25 MB (total). L2 cache: 1.25 MB (per core). Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 100 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 27,299 points. Launch price was $1,751.

⚡

Processing Power

The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-2775TE offers 16 cores / 32 threads — the Xeon D-2775TE has 8 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2775TE — a 34.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture (7 nm, 12 nm), while the Xeon D-2775TE uses Ice Lake-D (2022−2023) (10 nm). In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon D-2775TE's 27,299 — a 19.6% lead for the Xeon D-2775TE. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 25 MB (total) on the Xeon D-2775TE.

Feature	Ryzen 7 3700X	Xeon D-2775TE
Cores / Threads	8 / 16	16 / 32+100%
Boost Clock	4.4 GHz+42%	3.1 GHz
Base Clock	3.6 GHz+80%	2 GHz
L3 Cache	32 MB+28%	25 MB (total)
L2 Cache	512K (per core)	1.25 MB (per core)+150%
Process	7 nm, 12 nm-30%	10 nm
Architecture	Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020)	Ice Lake-D (2022−2023)
PassMark	22,430	27,299+22%

🧠

Memory & Platform

The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2775TE uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard.