
Ryzen 7 3700X
Popular choices:

Xeon D-2795NT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - CPU
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, productivity performance, platform differences, power efficiency, pricing context, and upgrade path so you can see which CPU actually makes more sense.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.1% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 110W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 28,463).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2795NT, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon D-2795NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon D-2795NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅+26.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌69.2% higher power demand at 110W vs 65W.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Xeon D-2795NT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Better for gaming: +38.1% higher average FPS across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ✅Draws 65W instead of 110W, a 45W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅+26.9% higher PassMark.
- ✅Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- ✅33.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark (22,430 vs 28,463).
- ❌Less compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2795NT, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
- ❌Launch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon D-2795NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Worse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 36 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- ❌69.2% higher power demand at 110W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon D-2795NT?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Games Benchmarks
To accurately isolate CPU performance, all benchmarks below use an NVIDIA RTX 4090 as the reference GPU. This eliminates GPU-side bottlenecks and highlights pure processing throughput differences between the CPUs.
Note: Real-world results may vary based on your actual GPU. CPU performance impact is more visible in processing-intensive titles and high-refresh-rate gaming scenarios.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 200 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 163 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 137 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 156 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 121 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 100 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 80 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 84 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 71 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 44 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 213 FPS |
| medium | 525 FPS | 189 FPS |
| high | 428 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 383 FPS | 131 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 545 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 471 FPS | 168 FPS |
| high | 394 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 337 FPS | 117 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 350 FPS | 119 FPS |
| medium | 304 FPS | 110 FPS |
| high | 274 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 242 FPS | 78 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 582 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 505 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 443 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 588 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 538 FPS | 416 FPS |
| ultra | 470 FPS | 363 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 499 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 394 FPS | 334 FPS |
| high | 343 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 230 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 712 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 642 FPS |
| ultra | 561 FPS | 548 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 561 FPS | 574 FPS |
| high | 561 FPS | 493 FPS |
| ultra | 555 FPS | 419 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 561 FPS | 451 FPS |
| medium | 501 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 447 FPS | 358 FPS |
| ultra | 396 FPS | 309 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Ryzen 7 3700X and Xeon D-2795NT


Ryzen 7 3700X
Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon D-2795NT
Xeon D-2795NT
The Xeon D-2795NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,463 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-2795NT offers 20 cores / 40 threads — the Xeon D-2795NT has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2795NT — a 34.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X is built on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon D-2795NT's 28,463 — a 23.7% lead for the Xeon D-2795NT. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 30 MB on the Xeon D-2795NT.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+42% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+7% | 30 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | — |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019−2020) | — |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 28,463+27% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | — | 15,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | — | 1,962 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | — | 11,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2795NT uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) — making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Both support up to DDR4-3200 memory speed. The Xeon D-2795NT supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB — 155.6% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 4 (Xeon D-2795NT). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 32 (Xeon D-2795NT) — the Xeon D-2795NT offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and SoC platform (Xeon D-2795NT).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA2579 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200 | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1024 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 32+33% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon D-2795NT). Primary use case: Xeon D-2795NT targets Networking / Edge Computing / SoC. Direct competitor: Xeon D-2795NT rivals EPYC 7302.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | — | No |
| AVX-512 | — | Yes |
| Virtualization | — | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | — | Networking / Edge Computing / SoC |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.











