
Ryzen 7 3700X

Xeon D-2795NT
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon D-2795NT Performance Spectrum
About PassMark
PassMark CPU Mark evaluates processor speed through complex mathematical computations. It provides a reliable metric to compare multi-core performance, where higher scores indicate faster processing for multitasking, gaming, and heavy workloads.
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon D-2795NT FPS Benchmarks
Predicted gaming performance across popular games. Tested paired with GeForce RTX 5090 to isolate CPU performance.
Search any supported game below to compare 1080p FPS for both components.

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Valorant

Among Us

Apex Legends

ARC Raiders

Baldur's Gate 3

Call of Duty: Black Ops 6
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon D-2795NT: Pros, Cons & Final Verdict
See where each CPU makes more sense in practice: gaming, heavier work, platform cost, power draw, and upgrade path.
Ryzen 7 3700X
2019Why buy it
- β Better for gaming: +34.9% higher average FPS across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β Draws 65W instead of 110W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- βLower PassMark (22,430 vs 28,463).
- βLess compelling for workstation-style loads than Xeon D-2795NT, which brings 20 cores / 40 threads and 32 PCIe lanes.
- βLaunch MSRP is still $329 MSRP, while Xeon D-2795NT mostly shows up through inconsistent older-market listings.
Xeon D-2795NT
2022Why buy it
- β +26.9% higher PassMark.
- β Better for workstations and heavier parallel workloads: 20 cores / 40 threads, plus 32 PCIe lanes vs 24.
- β 33.3% more PCIe lanes (32 vs 24) for storage and expansion-heavy builds.
Trade-offs
- βWorse for gaming: lower average FPS than Ryzen 7 3700X across 50 shared CPU benchmark tests.
- β69.2% higher power demand at 110W vs 65W.
Quick Answers
So, is Ryzen 7 3700X better than Xeon D-2795NT?
Which one is better for streaming, content creation, and heavy multitasking?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper CPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Ryzen 7 3700X vs Xeon D-2795NT Technical Specifications
Side-by-side specs, architecture details, clocks, memory, power, and platform differences.


Ryzen 7 3700X
The Ryzen 7 3700X is manufactured by AMD. It was released in 7 July 2019 (6 years ago). It is based on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. It features 8 cores and 16 threads. Base frequency is 3.6 GHz, with boost up to 4.4 GHz. L3 cache: 32 MB. L2 cache: 512K (per core). Built on 7 nm, 12 nm process technology. Socket: AM4. Thermal design power (TDP): 65 Watt. Memory support: DDR4 Dual-channel. Passmark benchmark score: 22,430 points. Launch price was $329.

Xeon D-2795NT
The Xeon D-2795NT is manufactured by Intel. It was released in 2015-01-01. It features 20 cores and 40 threads. Base frequency is 2 GHz, with boost up to 3.1 GHz. L3 cache: 30 MB. Built on 10 nm process technology. Socket: FCBGA2579. Thermal design power (TDP): 110 Watt. Memory support: DDR4. Passmark benchmark score: 28,463 points. Launch price was $800.
Processing Power
The Ryzen 7 3700X packs 8 cores / 16 threads, while the Xeon D-2795NT offers 20 cores / 40 threads β the Xeon D-2795NT has 12 more cores. Boost clocks reach 4.4 GHz on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus 3.1 GHz on the Xeon D-2795NT β a 34.7% clock advantage for the Ryzen 7 3700X (base: 3.6 GHz vs 2 GHz). The Ryzen 7 3700X is built on the Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) architecture. In PassMark, the Ryzen 7 3700X scores 22,430 against the Xeon D-2795NT's 28,463 β a 23.7% lead for the Xeon D-2795NT. L3 cache: 32 MB on the Ryzen 7 3700X vs 30 MB on the Xeon D-2795NT.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Cores / Threads | 8 / 16 | 20 / 40+150% |
| Boost Clock | 4.4 GHz+42% | 3.1 GHz |
| Base Clock | 3.6 GHz+80% | 2 GHz |
| L3 Cache | 32 MB+7% | 30 MB |
| L2 Cache | 512K (per core) | β |
| Process | 7 nm, 12 nm-30% | 10 nm |
| Architecture | Matisse (Zen 2) (2019β2020) | β |
| PassMark | 22,430 | 28,463+27% |
| Cinebench R23 Multi | β | 15,000 |
| Geekbench 6 Single | β | 1,962 |
| Geekbench 6 Multi | β | 11,898 |
Memory & Platform
The Ryzen 7 3700X uses the AM4 socket (PCIe 4.0), while the Xeon D-2795NT uses FCBGA2579 (PCIe 4.0) β making them incompatible on the same motherboard. Maximum memory speed reaches DDR4-3200 on the Ryzen 7 3700X versus DDR4-2933 on the Xeon D-2795NT β the Ryzen 7 3700X supports 9.1% faster memory, which can translate to measurable gains in memory-sensitive workloads. The Xeon D-2795NT supports up to 1024 GB of RAM compared to 128 GB β 700% more capacity for professional workloads. Memory channels: 2 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 4 (Xeon D-2795NT). PCIe lanes: 24 (Ryzen 7 3700X) vs 32 (Xeon D-2795NT) β the Xeon D-2795NT offers 8 more lanes for additional GPUs or NVMe drives. Chipset compatibility: AMD 500 series,AMD 400 series,AMD 300 series (Ryzen 7 3700X) and SoC platform (Xeon D-2795NT).
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Socket | AM4 | FCBGA2579 |
| PCIe Generation | PCIe 4.0 | PCIe 4.0 |
| Max RAM Speed | DDR4-3200+9% | DDR4-2933 |
| Max RAM Capacity | 128 GB | 1024 GB+700% |
| RAM Channels | 2 | 4+100% |
| ECC Support | Yes | Yes |
| PCIe Lanes | 24 | 32+33% |
Advanced Features
Virtualization: not specified (Ryzen 7 3700X) / VT-x, VT-d (Xeon D-2795NT). Primary use case: Xeon D-2795NT targets Networking / Edge Computing / SoC. Direct competitor: Xeon D-2795NT rivals EPYC 7302.
| Feature | Ryzen 7 3700X | Xeon D-2795NT |
|---|---|---|
| Integrated GPU | No | No |
| Unlocked | β | No |
| AVX-512 | β | Yes |
| Virtualization | β | VT-x, VT-d |
| Target Use | β | Networking / Edge Computing / SoC |
Top Performing CPUs
The most powerful cpus ranked by PassMark CPU Mark benchmark scores.












